Abstract
Cardinal numbers serve two logically complementary functions. They tell us how many things are within a set, and they tell us whether two sets are equivalent or not. Current modelling of counting focuses on the representation of number sufficient for the within-set function; however, such representations are necessary but not sufficient for the equivalence function. We propose that there needs to be some consideration of how the link between counting and set-comparison is achieved during formative years of numeracy. We work through the implications to identify how this crucial change in numerical understanding occurs. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 203-208 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Trends in Cognitive Sciences |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2009 |