Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

191 Citations (Scopus)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

@article{e778ffdb9bf5416fbb0530ea404095f8,

title = "Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign",

author = "Daniele Fanelli",

year = "2013",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1371/journal.pmed.1001563",

language = "English",

volume = "10",

journal = "PLOS Medicine",

issn = "1549-1277",

publisher = "Public Library of Science",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign

AU - Fanelli, Daniele

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84892898739

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001563

DO - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001563

M3 - Article

C2 - 24311988

AN - SCOPUS:84892898739

SN - 1549-1277

VL - 10

JO - PLOS Medicine

JF - PLOS Medicine

IS - 12

M1 - e1001563

ER -