What would be the impact of temporarily fracturing production wells during squeeze treatments?

A Al-Rabaani, Eric James Mackay

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    It is generally assumed that scale-inhibitor squeeze treatments in production wells are displaced radially into the formation because it is normal to pump these treatments below the fracture pressure. However, it is known that thermal stresses as a result of injecting cold fluids can result in thermally induced fractures (TIFs). This paper addresses the evidence of thermal fracturing during low-volume (less than 10,000 bbl) treatments, and asks: What would be the impact on squeeze life of treating a well that was fractured during treatment vs. a nonfractured well?

    The process involves modeling fractured and unfractured treatments to identify advantages and disadvantages of temporarily fracturing a well during a squeeze treatment in terms of inhibitor placement. While inhibitor may be placed at a greater distance from the wellbore if the formation is fractured during the treatment, the surface area of rock contacted during the treatment may be less than is the case in radial displacements. Issues such as consolidated vs. unconsolidated formations, initial reservoir temperature, fluid temperature at the sandface during injection, injection rate, and fracture dimensions should be considered.

    In general, this work demonstrates that there are clear advantages to temporarily fracturing a well during a squeeze treatment, depending on the inhibitor-return concentrations required to prevent mineral-scale formation.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)262-269
    Number of pages8
    JournalSPE Production and Operations
    Volume26
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011

    Fingerprint

    inhibitor
    well
    fluid
    pump
    surface area
    temperature
    mineral
    rock
    modeling

    Cite this

    @article{cbc9b9140557496598dd6f2b2c088386,
    title = "What would be the impact of temporarily fracturing production wells during squeeze treatments?",
    abstract = "It is generally assumed that scale-inhibitor squeeze treatments in production wells are displaced radially into the formation because it is normal to pump these treatments below the fracture pressure. However, it is known that thermal stresses as a result of injecting cold fluids can result in thermally induced fractures (TIFs). This paper addresses the evidence of thermal fracturing during low-volume (less than 10,000 bbl) treatments, and asks: What would be the impact on squeeze life of treating a well that was fractured during treatment vs. a nonfractured well? The process involves modeling fractured and unfractured treatments to identify advantages and disadvantages of temporarily fracturing a well during a squeeze treatment in terms of inhibitor placement. While inhibitor may be placed at a greater distance from the wellbore if the formation is fractured during the treatment, the surface area of rock contacted during the treatment may be less than is the case in radial displacements. Issues such as consolidated vs. unconsolidated formations, initial reservoir temperature, fluid temperature at the sandface during injection, injection rate, and fracture dimensions should be considered. In general, this work demonstrates that there are clear advantages to temporarily fracturing a well during a squeeze treatment, depending on the inhibitor-return concentrations required to prevent mineral-scale formation.",
    author = "A Al-Rabaani and Mackay, {Eric James}",
    year = "2011",
    month = "8",
    doi = "10.2118/98774-PA",
    language = "English",
    volume = "26",
    pages = "262--269",
    journal = "SPE Production and Operations",
    issn = "1930-1855",
    publisher = "Society of Petroleum Engineers",
    number = "3",

    }

    What would be the impact of temporarily fracturing production wells during squeeze treatments? / Al-Rabaani, A; Mackay, Eric James.

    In: SPE Production and Operations, Vol. 26, No. 3, 08.2011, p. 262-269.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - What would be the impact of temporarily fracturing production wells during squeeze treatments?

    AU - Al-Rabaani, A

    AU - Mackay, Eric James

    PY - 2011/8

    Y1 - 2011/8

    N2 - It is generally assumed that scale-inhibitor squeeze treatments in production wells are displaced radially into the formation because it is normal to pump these treatments below the fracture pressure. However, it is known that thermal stresses as a result of injecting cold fluids can result in thermally induced fractures (TIFs). This paper addresses the evidence of thermal fracturing during low-volume (less than 10,000 bbl) treatments, and asks: What would be the impact on squeeze life of treating a well that was fractured during treatment vs. a nonfractured well? The process involves modeling fractured and unfractured treatments to identify advantages and disadvantages of temporarily fracturing a well during a squeeze treatment in terms of inhibitor placement. While inhibitor may be placed at a greater distance from the wellbore if the formation is fractured during the treatment, the surface area of rock contacted during the treatment may be less than is the case in radial displacements. Issues such as consolidated vs. unconsolidated formations, initial reservoir temperature, fluid temperature at the sandface during injection, injection rate, and fracture dimensions should be considered. In general, this work demonstrates that there are clear advantages to temporarily fracturing a well during a squeeze treatment, depending on the inhibitor-return concentrations required to prevent mineral-scale formation.

    AB - It is generally assumed that scale-inhibitor squeeze treatments in production wells are displaced radially into the formation because it is normal to pump these treatments below the fracture pressure. However, it is known that thermal stresses as a result of injecting cold fluids can result in thermally induced fractures (TIFs). This paper addresses the evidence of thermal fracturing during low-volume (less than 10,000 bbl) treatments, and asks: What would be the impact on squeeze life of treating a well that was fractured during treatment vs. a nonfractured well? The process involves modeling fractured and unfractured treatments to identify advantages and disadvantages of temporarily fracturing a well during a squeeze treatment in terms of inhibitor placement. While inhibitor may be placed at a greater distance from the wellbore if the formation is fractured during the treatment, the surface area of rock contacted during the treatment may be less than is the case in radial displacements. Issues such as consolidated vs. unconsolidated formations, initial reservoir temperature, fluid temperature at the sandface during injection, injection rate, and fracture dimensions should be considered. In general, this work demonstrates that there are clear advantages to temporarily fracturing a well during a squeeze treatment, depending on the inhibitor-return concentrations required to prevent mineral-scale formation.

    U2 - 10.2118/98774-PA

    DO - 10.2118/98774-PA

    M3 - Article

    VL - 26

    SP - 262

    EP - 269

    JO - SPE Production and Operations

    JF - SPE Production and Operations

    SN - 1930-1855

    IS - 3

    ER -