What is modern about sovereign wealth funds A reply to Pete Moore

Gordon L. Clark*, Adam D. Dixon, Ashby H. B. Monk

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We welcome the opportunity to respond to Pete Moore's comments on our paper. In doing so, we address the central issue raised by Moore concerning our use of the term "modern" in our analysis of the origin, structure, and management of Gulf states' sovereign wealth funds. As it turns out, our use of the term modern is complex and multifaceted; we hope to show that the issue raised by Pete Moore runs in a variety of directions and is not so easily resolved, as he suggests.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)561-565
Number of pages5
JournalBusiness and Politics
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial relations
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What is modern about sovereign wealth funds A reply to Pete Moore'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this