Abstract
We welcome the opportunity to respond to Pete Moore's comments on our paper. In doing so, we address the central issue raised by Moore concerning our use of the term "modern" in our analysis of the origin, structure, and management of Gulf states' sovereign wealth funds. As it turns out, our use of the term modern is complex and multifaceted; we hope to show that the issue raised by Pete Moore runs in a variety of directions and is not so easily resolved, as he suggests.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 561-565 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Business and Politics |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2013 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Industrial relations
- Political Science and International Relations