Abstract
Understanding why an individual acted in a certain way is of fundamental importance to the human factors community, especially when the choice of action results in an undesirable outcome. This challenge is typically tackled by applying retrospective interview techniques to generate models of what happened, recording deviations from a 'correct procedure'. While such approaches may have great utility in tightly constrained procedural environments, they are less applicable in complex sociotechnical systems that require individuals to modify procedures in real time to respond to a changing environment. For complex sociotechnical systems, a formative approach is required that maps the information available to the individual and considers its impact on performance and action. A context-specific, activity-independent, constraint-based model forms the basis of this approach. To illustrate, an example of the Stockwell shooting is used, where an innocent man, mistaken for a suicide bomber, was shot dead. Transferable findings are then presented. © 2011 Taylor & Francis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 103-119 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Ergonomics |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Accident analysis
- Accidents
- Cognitive work analysis
- Command and control
- Decision making
- Error
- Perception
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What could they have been thinking? how sociotechnical system design influences cognition: A case study of the stockwell shooting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver