Weighting the competitiveness factors for container ports under conflicting interests

G. T. Yeo, D. W. Song, J. Dinwoodie, M. Roe

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    19 Citations (Scopus)


    Generally, an evaluation of container port competitiveness is regarded as a multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem which involves various stakeholders with conflicting interests. To solve MCDM problems, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method has been popular, but problems arise in managing uncertainty among decision makers, and contradictory opinions. The key issue discussed in this paper is how to obtain compromise weights (CWs) using a combined AHP procedure. This procedure incorporates Dempster-Shafer theory for eliminating uncertainty in the evaluation, and a levelling process for adjusting the contradictory opinions of each group, a so-called multiple decision-making group problem. For an empirical analysis, container ports located in Northeast Asia, known to exhibit severe port competition, were selected. Using an adoption of the methodology, the matrix of CWs was obtained. Using this matrix permits an exact evaluation of competitiveness in the sampled container ports. © 2010 Operational Research Society Ltd.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1249-1257
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of the Operational Research Society
    Issue number8
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2010


    • combined AHP procedure
    • compromise weights
    • container port competitiveness
    • Dempster-Shafer theory
    • multiple decision-making group problems


    Dive into the research topics of 'Weighting the competitiveness factors for container ports under conflicting interests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this