Abstract
The study of organizational routines has benefited from the work of scholars coming from a variety of disciplinary perspectives. However, there is evidence of serious misunderstanding and problems of communication across methodological divides. We focus on how the contribution of economics-oriented work in this area has been widely misinterpreted, with particular reference to the relationship between routines and change. We also discuss the potential for resolving many of these difficulties.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 943–956 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Industrial and Corporate Change |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 13 Aug 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2018 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'We need to talk: opposing narratives and conflicting perspectives in the conversation on routines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver