Waste materials for carbon capture and storage by mineralisation (CCSM) - A UK perspective

Aimaro Sanna, Marco Dri, Matthew R. Hall, Mercedes Maroto-Valer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This work reviews the advantages and disadvantages of using mineral wastes for CCS and their potential in CO2 abatement, highlighting the potential applications and scenarios. This study indicates that a variety of inorganic waste materials such as pulverised fuel ash, municipal solid waste ash, cement kiln dust, biomass and paper sludge ash and sewage sludge ash are available feedstocks for Carbon Capture and Storage by Mineralisation (CCSM) in the UK. The high variability of both the waste amounts and chemical composition represent a major obstacle to the deployment of these materials in CCSM. Currently, mineral waste resources for mineral carbonation have the theoretical potential to capture about 1 Mt/year CO2 in the UK, considering only the materials not recycled that are currently sent to landfill. Moreover, inorganic waste as a CCSM resource is in many ways more complex than the use of natural minerals due to uncertainty on future availability and high chemical variability and might be viable only in niche applications. For example, the use of inorganic wastes (concrete waste and steel slag) and buffer solutions in spray trickle bed systems (able to sequester 50% of the CO2 entering the system) was estimated to have costs competitive with geological storage. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)545-554
Number of pages10
JournalApplied Energy
Volume99
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012

Keywords

  • AQUEOUS CARBONATION
  • Waste reuse
  • Clean energy
  • POLLUTION CONTROL RESIDUES
  • OIL-SHALE ASH
  • FLY-ASH
  • PORTLAND-CEMENT
  • INDUSTRIAL-WASTES
  • APC RESIDUES
  • ACCELERATED CARBONATION
  • ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES
  • CCS
  • Mineral carbonation
  • Solid waste
  • CO2 SEQUESTRATION

Cite this