Valuing multiple benefits, and the public perception of SUDS ponds

Joy Ann Jarvie, Scott Arthur, Lindsay Catherine Beevers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)
207 Downloads (Pure)


Understanding how the public perceive and value ponds is fundamental to appreciate the synergy between Sustainable urban Drainage (SUDS) ponds and the multiple benefits they provide. This paper investigates this, through the application of a structured postal and online survey. It compares man-made ponds (including SUDS), and ponds with natural origins. The results from Whole Life Cost show that the benefits (based on Contingent Valuation) exceed the CAPEX and OPEX costs for three of five artificial ponds studied. Benefits from natural (reference) ponds exceed the replacement costs for a pond with the same surface area/catchment. This paper highlights the importance of monetising the multiple benefits from ponds.
Original languageEnglish
Article number128
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 16 Feb 2017


Dive into the research topics of 'Valuing multiple benefits, and the public perception of SUDS ponds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this