Using argumentation to tackle inconsistency and incompleteness in online distributed life science resources

Kenneth McLeod; Albert Georg Burger

Using argumentation to tackle inconsistency and incompleteness in online distributed life science resources

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

Abstract

This paper starts with a discussion of the sometimes contradictory and incomplete nature of distributed online bioinformatics resources. From this we suggest there is a need for a method to evaluate the data contained in such resources before they are used. The method we put forward uses a form of non-monotonic reasoning called argumentation. Arguments are created to help the user weigh up the evidence in favour of and against the biomedical information presented by different Internet-based resources.

Original language	English
Pages	489-492
Number of pages	4
Publication status	Published - 2007
Event	IADIS International Conference Applied Computing 2007 - Salamanca, Spain Duration: 18 Feb 2007 → 20 Feb 2007

Conference

Conference	IADIS International Conference Applied Computing 2007
Country/Territory	Spain
City	Salamanca
Period	18/02/07 → 20/02/07

Access to Document

http://www.iadisportal.org/digital-library/using-argumentation-to-tackle-inconsistency-and-incompleteness-in-online-distributed-life-science-resources

Cite this

McLeod, K., & Burger, A. G. (2007). Using argumentation to tackle inconsistency and incompleteness in online distributed life science resources. 489-492. Paper presented at IADIS International Conference Applied Computing 2007, Salamanca, Spain. http://www.iadisportal.org/digital-library/using-argumentation-to-tackle-inconsistency-and-incompleteness-in-online-distributed-life-science-resources

@conference{ec85945afaaa4b5b9c99be1a10161683,

title = "Using argumentation to tackle inconsistency and incompleteness in online distributed life science resources",

abstract = "This paper starts with a discussion of the sometimes contradictory and incomplete nature of distributed online bioinformatics resources. From this we suggest there is a need for a method to evaluate the data contained in such resources before they are used. The method we put forward uses a form of non-monotonic reasoning called argumentation. Arguments are created to help the user weigh up the evidence in favour of and against the biomedical information presented by different Internet-based resources.",

author = "Kenneth McLeod and Burger, \{Albert Georg\}",

note = "ISBN: 978-972-8924-30-0; IADIS International Conference Applied Computing 2007 ; Conference date: 18-02-2007 Through 20-02-2007",

year = "2007",

language = "English",

pages = "489--492",

}

McLeod, K & Burger, AG 2007, 'Using argumentation to tackle inconsistency and incompleteness in online distributed life science resources', Paper presented at IADIS International Conference Applied Computing 2007, Salamanca, Spain, 18/02/07 - 20/02/07 pp. 489-492. <http://www.iadisportal.org/digital-library/using-argumentation-to-tackle-inconsistency-and-incompleteness-in-online-distributed-life-science-resources>

TY - CONF

T1 - Using argumentation to tackle inconsistency and incompleteness in online distributed life science resources

AU - McLeod, Kenneth

AU - Burger, Albert Georg

N1 - ISBN: 978-972-8924-30-0

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This paper starts with a discussion of the sometimes contradictory and incomplete nature of distributed online bioinformatics resources. From this we suggest there is a need for a method to evaluate the data contained in such resources before they are used. The method we put forward uses a form of non-monotonic reasoning called argumentation. Arguments are created to help the user weigh up the evidence in favour of and against the biomedical information presented by different Internet-based resources.

AB - This paper starts with a discussion of the sometimes contradictory and incomplete nature of distributed online bioinformatics resources. From this we suggest there is a need for a method to evaluate the data contained in such resources before they are used. The method we put forward uses a form of non-monotonic reasoning called argumentation. Arguments are created to help the user weigh up the evidence in favour of and against the biomedical information presented by different Internet-based resources.

M3 - Paper

SP - 489

EP - 492

T2 - IADIS International Conference Applied Computing 2007

Y2 - 18 February 2007 through 20 February 2007

ER -

Using argumentation to tackle inconsistency and incompleteness in online distributed life science resources

Abstract

Conference

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this