This paper starts with a discussion of the sometimes contradictory and incomplete nature of distributed online bioinformatics resources. From this we suggest there is a need for a method to evaluate the data contained in such resources before they are used. The method we put forward uses a form of non-monotonic reasoning called argumentation. Arguments are created to help the user weigh up the evidence in favour of and against the biomedical information presented by different Internet-based resources.
|Number of pages||4|
|Publication status||Published - 2007|
|Event||IADIS International Conference Applied Computing 2007 - Salamanca, Spain|
Duration: 18 Feb 2007 → 20 Feb 2007
|Conference||IADIS International Conference Applied Computing 2007|
|Period||18/02/07 → 20/02/07|