Urban form and social sustainability: The role of density and housing type

Glen Bramley, Sinéad Power

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    326 Citations (Scopus)


    In the United Kingdom planning favours a more compact, high-density, and mixed-use urban form. Many of the claims made for such compact forms in terms of the sustainability benefits are contested, and few have been rigorously researched. Drawing upon policy and academic literature we identify two key dimensions of social sustainability: social equity and sustainability of community. Using data from the Survey of English Housing this paper analyses the relationship between key aspects of urban form, density, and housing type, and selected social sustainability outcomes. Simpler analyses suggest strong relationships between urban form and a range of outcomes, although in opposite directions for the equity and community dimensions. However, the impact of urban form on these outcomes is substantially modified once we control for exogenous and intervening demo- graphic and socioeconomic factors. In addition, outcome patterns relating to access to services and facilities favour denser urban forms at the same time as outcomes relating to sustainability of community remain adverse in denser areas. This suggests trade-offs within the social dimensions of sustainability, as well as between the social, environmental, and economic dimensions. © 2008 Pion Ltd and its Licensors.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)30-48
    Number of pages19
    JournalEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2009


    Dive into the research topics of 'Urban form and social sustainability: The role of density and housing type'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this