Urban form and social sustainability

The role of density and housing type

Glen Bramley, Sinéad Power

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    In the United Kingdom planning favours a more compact, high-density, and mixed-use urban form. Many of the claims made for such compact forms in terms of the sustainability benefits are contested, and few have been rigorously researched. Drawing upon policy and academic literature we identify two key dimensions of social sustainability: social equity and sustainability of community. Using data from the Survey of English Housing this paper analyses the relationship between key aspects of urban form, density, and housing type, and selected social sustainability outcomes. Simpler analyses suggest strong relationships between urban form and a range of outcomes, although in opposite directions for the equity and community dimensions. However, the impact of urban form on these outcomes is substantially modified once we control for exogenous and intervening demo- graphic and socioeconomic factors. In addition, outcome patterns relating to access to services and facilities favour denser urban forms at the same time as outcomes relating to sustainability of community remain adverse in denser areas. This suggests trade-offs within the social dimensions of sustainability, as well as between the social, environmental, and economic dimensions. © 2008 Pion Ltd and its Licensors.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)30-48
    Number of pages19
    JournalEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design
    Volume36
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    housing
    sustainability
    equity
    community
    socioeconomic factors
    planning
    economics

    Cite this

    @article{4b3e7136ab274ccc98875fdb208031d6,
    title = "Urban form and social sustainability: The role of density and housing type",
    abstract = "In the United Kingdom planning favours a more compact, high-density, and mixed-use urban form. Many of the claims made for such compact forms in terms of the sustainability benefits are contested, and few have been rigorously researched. Drawing upon policy and academic literature we identify two key dimensions of social sustainability: social equity and sustainability of community. Using data from the Survey of English Housing this paper analyses the relationship between key aspects of urban form, density, and housing type, and selected social sustainability outcomes. Simpler analyses suggest strong relationships between urban form and a range of outcomes, although in opposite directions for the equity and community dimensions. However, the impact of urban form on these outcomes is substantially modified once we control for exogenous and intervening demo- graphic and socioeconomic factors. In addition, outcome patterns relating to access to services and facilities favour denser urban forms at the same time as outcomes relating to sustainability of community remain adverse in denser areas. This suggests trade-offs within the social dimensions of sustainability, as well as between the social, environmental, and economic dimensions. {\circledC} 2008 Pion Ltd and its Licensors.",
    author = "Glen Bramley and Sin{\'e}ad Power",
    year = "2009",
    doi = "10.1068/b33129",
    language = "English",
    volume = "36",
    pages = "30--48",
    journal = "Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design",
    issn = "0265-8135",
    publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
    number = "1",

    }

    Urban form and social sustainability : The role of density and housing type. / Bramley, Glen; Power, Sinéad.

    In: Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2009, p. 30-48.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Urban form and social sustainability

    T2 - The role of density and housing type

    AU - Bramley, Glen

    AU - Power, Sinéad

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - In the United Kingdom planning favours a more compact, high-density, and mixed-use urban form. Many of the claims made for such compact forms in terms of the sustainability benefits are contested, and few have been rigorously researched. Drawing upon policy and academic literature we identify two key dimensions of social sustainability: social equity and sustainability of community. Using data from the Survey of English Housing this paper analyses the relationship between key aspects of urban form, density, and housing type, and selected social sustainability outcomes. Simpler analyses suggest strong relationships between urban form and a range of outcomes, although in opposite directions for the equity and community dimensions. However, the impact of urban form on these outcomes is substantially modified once we control for exogenous and intervening demo- graphic and socioeconomic factors. In addition, outcome patterns relating to access to services and facilities favour denser urban forms at the same time as outcomes relating to sustainability of community remain adverse in denser areas. This suggests trade-offs within the social dimensions of sustainability, as well as between the social, environmental, and economic dimensions. © 2008 Pion Ltd and its Licensors.

    AB - In the United Kingdom planning favours a more compact, high-density, and mixed-use urban form. Many of the claims made for such compact forms in terms of the sustainability benefits are contested, and few have been rigorously researched. Drawing upon policy and academic literature we identify two key dimensions of social sustainability: social equity and sustainability of community. Using data from the Survey of English Housing this paper analyses the relationship between key aspects of urban form, density, and housing type, and selected social sustainability outcomes. Simpler analyses suggest strong relationships between urban form and a range of outcomes, although in opposite directions for the equity and community dimensions. However, the impact of urban form on these outcomes is substantially modified once we control for exogenous and intervening demo- graphic and socioeconomic factors. In addition, outcome patterns relating to access to services and facilities favour denser urban forms at the same time as outcomes relating to sustainability of community remain adverse in denser areas. This suggests trade-offs within the social dimensions of sustainability, as well as between the social, environmental, and economic dimensions. © 2008 Pion Ltd and its Licensors.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66349132725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1068/b33129

    DO - 10.1068/b33129

    M3 - Article

    VL - 36

    SP - 30

    EP - 48

    JO - Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

    JF - Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

    SN - 0265-8135

    IS - 1

    ER -