TY - JOUR
T1 - Untangling social–ecological interactions
T2 - A methods portfolio approach to tackling contemporary sustainability challenges in fisheries
AU - Lindkvist, Emilie
AU - Pellowe, Kara E.
AU - Alexander, Steven M.
AU - Drury O'Neill, Elizabeth
AU - Finkbeiner, Elena M.
AU - Girón-Nava, Alfredo
AU - González-Mon, Blanca
AU - Johnson, Andrew F.
AU - Pittman, Jeremy
AU - Schill, Caroline
AU - Wijermans, Nanda
AU - Bodin, Örjan
AU - Gelcich, Stefan
AU - Glaser, Marion
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Rodrigo Martínez‐Peña and Thorsten Blenckner for creative and helpful comments on a previous version of this manuscript, and Sonja Radosavljevic for diligently explaining dynamical systems and system dynamics modelling. We would also like to thank the participants and panellists of the ‘Untangling social–ecological interdependencies: Theoretical and Methodological Insights from Studies of Small‐Scale Fisheries’ session at the Resilience 2017 conference, the Stockholm Resilience Centre and the Interacting Complexities Theme and the Human Oceans Theme for inspiration and funding support, and the Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for providing workshop facilities. EL, BGM, KEP, AGN and AFJ were partly supported by NSF CNH‐L: DEB‐1632648. EL and LDO were supported by the Swedish Research Council, Dnr 2018‐05862. EL was also supported by the Swedish Research Council (Dnr 2018‐06139). KEP was supported by the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA REEF‐FUTURES project under the BiodivScen ERA‐Net COFUND program (Grant No. RGPBB/525590). BGM was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 682472 — MUSES). CS was supported by the Swedish Research Council (Dnr 2017‐05641). NW was supported by the Swedish Research Council Formas (Dnr 2018‐00401). ÖB was supported by the Swedish Research Council Formas (Dnr 2020‐01551) and the Swedish Research Council (Dnr 2016‐04263). SG thanks ANID PIA/BASAL FB0002 and Millennium Science initiative program ICN 2019_015.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Fish and Fisheries published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Meeting the objectives of sustainable fisheries management requires attention to the complex interactions between humans, institutions and ecosystems that give rise to fishery outcomes. Traditional approaches to studying fisheries often do not fully capture, nor focus on these complex interactions between people and ecosystems. Despite advances in the scope and scale of interactions encompassed by more holistic methods, for example ecosystem-based fisheries management approaches, no single method can adequately capture the complexity of human–nature interactions. Approaches that combine quantitative and qualitative analytical approaches are necessary to generate a deeper understanding of these interactions and illuminate pathways to address fisheries sustainability challenges. However, combining methods is inherently challenging and requires understanding multiple methods from different, often disciplinarily distinct origins, demanding reflexivity of the researchers involved. Social–ecological systems’ research has a history of utilising combinations of methods across the social and ecological realms to account for spatial and temporal dynamics, uncertainty and feedbacks that are key components of fisheries. We describe several categories of analytical methods (statistical modelling, network analysis, dynamic modelling, qualitative analysis and controlled behavioural experiments) and highlight their applications in fisheries research, strengths and limitations, data needs and overall objectives. We then discuss important considerations of a methods portfolio development process, including reflexivity, epistemological and ontological concerns and illustrate these considerations via three case studies. We show that, by expanding their methods portfolios, researchers will be better equipped to study the complex interactions shaping fisheries and contribute to solutions for sustainable fisheries management.
AB - Meeting the objectives of sustainable fisheries management requires attention to the complex interactions between humans, institutions and ecosystems that give rise to fishery outcomes. Traditional approaches to studying fisheries often do not fully capture, nor focus on these complex interactions between people and ecosystems. Despite advances in the scope and scale of interactions encompassed by more holistic methods, for example ecosystem-based fisheries management approaches, no single method can adequately capture the complexity of human–nature interactions. Approaches that combine quantitative and qualitative analytical approaches are necessary to generate a deeper understanding of these interactions and illuminate pathways to address fisheries sustainability challenges. However, combining methods is inherently challenging and requires understanding multiple methods from different, often disciplinarily distinct origins, demanding reflexivity of the researchers involved. Social–ecological systems’ research has a history of utilising combinations of methods across the social and ecological realms to account for spatial and temporal dynamics, uncertainty and feedbacks that are key components of fisheries. We describe several categories of analytical methods (statistical modelling, network analysis, dynamic modelling, qualitative analysis and controlled behavioural experiments) and highlight their applications in fisheries research, strengths and limitations, data needs and overall objectives. We then discuss important considerations of a methods portfolio development process, including reflexivity, epistemological and ontological concerns and illustrate these considerations via three case studies. We show that, by expanding their methods portfolios, researchers will be better equipped to study the complex interactions shaping fisheries and contribute to solutions for sustainable fisheries management.
KW - analytical methods
KW - fisheries management
KW - interdisciplinarity
KW - multi-method approaches
KW - reflexivity
KW - social–ecological systems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131361122&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/faf.12678
DO - 10.1111/faf.12678
M3 - Article
C2 - 36247348
AN - SCOPUS:85131361122
SN - 1467-2960
VL - 23
SP - 1202
EP - 1220
JO - Fish and Fisheries
JF - Fish and Fisheries
IS - 5
ER -