Undergraduate degree awards in teacher education: Constant standards in a Changing context

Stephen Sharp

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In the past, assessment in higher education has been treated as a matter determined by, and confidential to, Boards of Examiners. In future, however, this may have to change in response to a number of changes in the context of higher education. The student population is more diverse and is taking an increasing control of the curriculum through the modularisation of courses. Student charters instil expectations that details of assessment procedures will be made explicit and published. Awards may increasingly be challenged. This paper examines a number of issues which will have to be debated more openly in the future. They include the statistics of aggregating component grades into degree classes, the widening range of skills covered by higher education courses and the most appropriate formats for summative reporting. The paper aims not to offer answers but to help to clarify some of the questions around which debate will be required. © 1996 Journals Oxford Ltd.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)325-334
    Number of pages10
    JournalAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
    Volume21
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1996

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Undergraduate degree awards in teacher education: Constant standards in a Changing context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this