TY - JOUR
T1 - Trawl impacts on the relative status of biotic communities of seabed sedimentary habitats in 24 regions worldwide
AU - Pitcher, C. Roland
AU - Hiddink, Jan G.
AU - Jennings, Simon
AU - Collie, Jeremy
AU - Parma, Ana M.
AU - Amoroso, Ricardo
AU - Mazor, Tessa
AU - Sciberras, Marija
AU - McConnaughey, Robert A.
AU - Rijnsdorp, Adriaan D.
AU - Kaiser, Michel J.
AU - Suuronen, Petri
AU - Hilborn, Ray
N1 - Funding Information:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. This paper is an output of the “Trawling Best Practices Project.” Chris Jenkins provided dbSeabed sediment data; regional fisheries agencies provided trawl effort data; Michelle Bachman (New England Fishery Management Council) and David Keith (Department of Fisheries & Oceans, Canada) provided fishing intensity data for sampled sites on Georges Bank; and comments from Anthony Richardson and Eva Plaganyi improved the manuscript. We acknowledge our organizations for salary support and the Walton Family Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, and several fishing industry organizations for the funding of regional workshops and travel.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/1/11
Y1 - 2022/1/11
N2 - Bottom trawling is widespread globally and impacts seabed habitats. However, risks from trawling remain unquantified at large scales in most regions. We address these issues by synthesizing evidence on the impacts of different trawl-gear types, seabed recovery rates, and spatial distributions of trawling intensity in a quantitative indicator of biotic status (relative amount of pretrawling biota) for sedimentary habitats, where most bottom-trawling occurs, in 24 regions worldwide. Regional average status relative to an untrawled state (=1) was high (>0.9) in 15 regions, but <0.7 in three (European) regions and only 0.25 in the Adriatic Sea. Across all regions, 66% of seabed area was not trawled (status = 1), 1.5% was depleted (status = 0), and 93% had status > 0.8. These assessments are first order, based on parameters estimated with uncertainty from meta-analyses; we recommend regional analyses to refine parameters for local specificity. Nevertheless, our results are sufficiently robust to highlight regions needing more effective management to reduce exploitation and improve stock sustainability and seabed environmental status-while also showing seabed status was high (>0.95) in regions where catches of trawled fish stocks meet accepted benchmarks for sustainable exploitation, demonstrating that environmental benefits accrue from effective fisheries management. Furthermore, regional seabed status was related to the proportional area swept by trawling, enabling preliminary predictions of regional status when only the total amount of trawling is known. This research advances seascape-scale understanding of trawl impacts in regions around the world, enables quantitative assessment of sustainability risks, and facilitates implementation of an ecosystem approach to trawl fisheries management globally.
AB - Bottom trawling is widespread globally and impacts seabed habitats. However, risks from trawling remain unquantified at large scales in most regions. We address these issues by synthesizing evidence on the impacts of different trawl-gear types, seabed recovery rates, and spatial distributions of trawling intensity in a quantitative indicator of biotic status (relative amount of pretrawling biota) for sedimentary habitats, where most bottom-trawling occurs, in 24 regions worldwide. Regional average status relative to an untrawled state (=1) was high (>0.9) in 15 regions, but <0.7 in three (European) regions and only 0.25 in the Adriatic Sea. Across all regions, 66% of seabed area was not trawled (status = 1), 1.5% was depleted (status = 0), and 93% had status > 0.8. These assessments are first order, based on parameters estimated with uncertainty from meta-analyses; we recommend regional analyses to refine parameters for local specificity. Nevertheless, our results are sufficiently robust to highlight regions needing more effective management to reduce exploitation and improve stock sustainability and seabed environmental status-while also showing seabed status was high (>0.95) in regions where catches of trawled fish stocks meet accepted benchmarks for sustainable exploitation, demonstrating that environmental benefits accrue from effective fisheries management. Furthermore, regional seabed status was related to the proportional area swept by trawling, enabling preliminary predictions of regional status when only the total amount of trawling is known. This research advances seascape-scale understanding of trawl impacts in regions around the world, enables quantitative assessment of sustainability risks, and facilitates implementation of an ecosystem approach to trawl fisheries management globally.
KW - Habitat sensitivity
KW - Recovery
KW - Spatial upscaling
KW - Trawl footprints
KW - Trawl impacts
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122687248&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.2109449119
DO - 10.1073/pnas.2109449119
M3 - Article
C2 - 34983873
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 119
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
IS - 2
M1 - e2109449119
ER -