Three-phase relative permeability and hysteresis effect during WAG process in mixed wet and low IFT systems

Hamid Reza Shahverdi, Mehran Sohrabi Sedeh, Seyyed Mobeen Fatemi, Mahmoud Jamiolahmady

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)
70 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is significant uncertainty associated with the selection of three-phase relative permeability in particular for the numerical simulations of water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection. Generally, three-phase relative permeabilities are calculated from empirical correlations, which are based on two-phase relative permeabilities. Water alternating gas injection involves drainage and imbibition processes taking place sequentially. Therefore, accurate prediction of the relative permeability (k(r)) functions and their hysteresis effects applicable to WAG are extremely complex. The problem of 3-phase k(r) selection becomes even more difficult for three-phase systems involving mixed-wet rocks and low gas-oil IFT (interfacial tension) fluids (nearly-miscible fluids).

We use the results of coreflood experiments carried out on two different cores (one water-wet and one mixed-wet) using a low IFT gas-oil system to generate two-phase and three-phase relative permeability data by using an in-house three-phase coreflood simulator.

The results show that water and gas three-phase k(r) values depend on two independent saturations, contrary to the inherent assumption in most of the existing empirical k(r) models. Three-phase water, oil and gas k(r) values were all significantly lower than their corresponding two-phase values. This reduction in k(r) was more profound for the gas where the three-phase k(rg) was an order of magnitude lower than its corresponding two-phase kg. Using the laboratory derived three-phase k(r) data, the performance of some of the existing three-phase k(r) models was evaluated by comparing the results of the WAG experiments with predictions made by a commercial reservoir simulator. In general, considerable discrepancies between the measured and the predicted k(r) values were observed. Some models performed better than others but no single model was capable of matching all experimental results adequately.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)732-739
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Volume78
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011

Cite this