TY - JOUR
T1 - Thermal comfort standards in the Middle East: Current and future challenges
AU - Elnaklah, Rana
AU - Alnuaimi, Abdulla
AU - Alotaibi, Badr S.
AU - Topriska, Evangelia
AU - Walker, Ian
AU - Natarajan, Sukumar
N1 - Funding Information:
Overall, this robust evidence shows the gap between the current thermal comfort codes used in the ME and the actual occupant thermal sensation, also it offers evidence on the potential energy reduction in the air-conditioned buildings if more localised thermal comfort codes are enforced. Although there are emerging attempts by Middle Eastern countries, i.e., Qatar to develop local thermal comfort codes, it seems that these codes lack supporting evidence from any field survey as shown in section 4.5, despite the fact that GSAS requires a thermal comfort survey after occupancy as a compulsory credit (see section 1.1).This work is supported by Al-Ahliyya Amman University in Jordan. A. Alnuaimi reports funding from Qatar university, and B. Alotaibi reports funding from Saudi Arabian Cultural Bureau (SACB) in London.The authors express their gratitude to the EPSRC for their support via the EPSRC Centre for Decarbonisation of the Built Environment (dCarb). We would like also to thank Research Centre at the International Medical Centre (IMC) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia for facilitating the data collection. The authors would like to thank Mr Mualla for helping with the data collection, the management of the surveyed buildings in all countries for allowing the authors to conduct the study, and all participants in this research. This work is supported by Al-Ahliyya Amman University in Jordan. A. Alnuaimi reports funding from Qatar university in Qatar, and B. Alotaibi reports funding from Saudi Arabian Cultural Bureau (SACB) in London.
Funding Information:
This work is supported by Al-Ahliyya Amman University in Jordan. A. Alnuaimi reports funding from Qatar university, and B. Alotaibi reports funding from Saudi Arabian Cultural Bureau (SACB) in London.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Cooling energy demand has increased three-fold in the Middle East (ME) over the last 30-years. This is driven by the need to maintain thermal comfort in an extremely hot climate, and supported by rising incomes, falling costs of air-conditioning and growth in the number of buildings. The definition of thermal comfort in these buildings is drawn from “international” standards, which, though empirically derived, have no basis data from this region. Hence, we ask, to what extent do indoor conditions in the ME fall within the standards recommended range of thermal comfort, and when they do, whether they are found to be comfortable by their occupants. We present the first large-scale study of thermal comfort in the ME, consisting of two approaches: (i) a meta-analysis of data from existing studies, (ii) independent field data covering four countries representing 27% of the region's population, 31 air-conditioned buildings of different types, including “green” buildings, and 1,101 subjects. The meta-analysis demonstrates that current thermal comfort standards fail to predict thermal sensation of 94% of occupants. Our own data show that, while indoor conditions are within standards-recommended ranges 58% of the time, only 40% of occupants find these conditions acceptable. We find evidence of overcooling in summers, with 39% occupants expressing cold discomfort. Computer models suggest that this is likely to have increased annual cooling energy demand between 13% and 20%, compared to non-overcooled conditions. These results suggest the necessity of localised thermal comfort standards that mitigate excess cooling energy demand, without compromising occupant thermal comfort.
AB - Cooling energy demand has increased three-fold in the Middle East (ME) over the last 30-years. This is driven by the need to maintain thermal comfort in an extremely hot climate, and supported by rising incomes, falling costs of air-conditioning and growth in the number of buildings. The definition of thermal comfort in these buildings is drawn from “international” standards, which, though empirically derived, have no basis data from this region. Hence, we ask, to what extent do indoor conditions in the ME fall within the standards recommended range of thermal comfort, and when they do, whether they are found to be comfortable by their occupants. We present the first large-scale study of thermal comfort in the ME, consisting of two approaches: (i) a meta-analysis of data from existing studies, (ii) independent field data covering four countries representing 27% of the region's population, 31 air-conditioned buildings of different types, including “green” buildings, and 1,101 subjects. The meta-analysis demonstrates that current thermal comfort standards fail to predict thermal sensation of 94% of occupants. Our own data show that, while indoor conditions are within standards-recommended ranges 58% of the time, only 40% of occupants find these conditions acceptable. We find evidence of overcooling in summers, with 39% occupants expressing cold discomfort. Computer models suggest that this is likely to have increased annual cooling energy demand between 13% and 20%, compared to non-overcooled conditions. These results suggest the necessity of localised thermal comfort standards that mitigate excess cooling energy demand, without compromising occupant thermal comfort.
KW - Cooling energy demand
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Middle East
KW - Thermal comfort standards
KW - Thermal sensation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109975927&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107899
DO - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107899
M3 - Article
SN - 0360-1323
VL - 200
JO - Building and Environment
JF - Building and Environment
M1 - 107899
ER -