Abstract
Recently it has been argued that the worked-example effect, as postulated by Cognitive Load Theory, might only occur when compared to unsupported problem-solving, but not when compared to well-supported or tutored problem-solving as instantiated, for example, in Cognitive Tutors. In two experiments, we compared a standard Cognitive Tutor with a version that was enriched with faded worked examples. In Experiment 1, students in the example condition needed less learning time to acquire a comparable amount of procedural skills and conceptual understanding. In Experiment 2, the efficiency advantage was replicated. In addition, students in the example condition acquired a deeper conceptual understanding. The present findings demonstrate that the worked-example effect is indeed robust and can be found even when compared to well-supported learning by problem-solving.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 258-266 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Computers in Human Behavior |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2009 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The worked-example effect: Not an artefact of lousy control conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver