The scholarship of teaching and learning and pedagogic research within the disciplines: should it be included in the research excellence framework?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper is a response to Cotton, Miller and Kneale’s 2017 paper on the current state of higher education research within UK universities. It seeks to contribute to the debate surrounding the inclusion of pedagogic research (PedR) via SoTL in the UK’s Research Excellence Framework (REF) in the context of researchers who reside within a disciplinary context. The inclusion of PedR in the REF continues to be contentious, despite recommendations in the Stern Report which could make its inclusion more feasible. This paper focuses on PedR which is conducted, published and disseminated by academics situated within Life Science departments, rather than Schools of Education. The twenty-one teaching-focused academics in this study discussed their commitment to PedR integral to their academic identity, the challenges they faced in carrying out PedR, and their thoughts on REF 2014. Their opinions and conclusions give food for thought on decisions regarding inclusion of PedR in REF 2021.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)176-186
Number of pages11
JournalStudies in Higher Education
Volume45
Issue number1
Early online date17 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2020

Keywords

  • higher education
  • pedagogic research
  • research excellence framework
  • scholarship of teaching and learning
  • Teaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The scholarship of teaching and learning and pedagogic research within the disciplines: should it be included in the research excellence framework?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this