The North Sea rigs-to-reefs debate

M S P Baine

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Against a background where a sharp division of stakeholder opinion exists between proponents and opponents, I provide an evaluation of the rigs-to-reefs concept in the North Sea in terms of abandonment legislation, scientific foundation, and perceived acceptability to the environmental and fishing sectors. An analysis of the political situation suggests the need for a revision of the United Kingdom's Best Practicable Environmental Option process. Priority attention should be given to the issues of drill-cuttings piles and the long-term fate of reefs. Offshore reef creation, including deployment in conjunction with a "no fishing" policy, is assessed as politically sensitive and difficult to achieve. Finding supporting beneficiaries and solving cost implications are deemed critical to the planning of a nearshore reef programme. The importance of a genuine stakeholder dialogue process is stressed, as is the crucial role of fishermen to the success of rigs-to-reefs ventures. © 2002 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)277-280
    Number of pages4
    JournalICES Journal of Marine Science
    Volume59
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Fingerprint

    reef
    fishing
    stakeholder
    legislation
    pile
    sea
    cost

    Keywords

    • Decommissioning
    • Fisheries
    • Rigs-to-reefs
    • Stakeholders

    Cite this

    Baine, M S P. / The North Sea rigs-to-reefs debate. In: ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2002 ; Vol. 59. pp. 277-280.
    @article{3f5a80a5c76244b4ac151d00889887f8,
    title = "The North Sea rigs-to-reefs debate",
    abstract = "Against a background where a sharp division of stakeholder opinion exists between proponents and opponents, I provide an evaluation of the rigs-to-reefs concept in the North Sea in terms of abandonment legislation, scientific foundation, and perceived acceptability to the environmental and fishing sectors. An analysis of the political situation suggests the need for a revision of the United Kingdom's Best Practicable Environmental Option process. Priority attention should be given to the issues of drill-cuttings piles and the long-term fate of reefs. Offshore reef creation, including deployment in conjunction with a {"}no fishing{"} policy, is assessed as politically sensitive and difficult to achieve. Finding supporting beneficiaries and solving cost implications are deemed critical to the planning of a nearshore reef programme. The importance of a genuine stakeholder dialogue process is stressed, as is the crucial role of fishermen to the success of rigs-to-reefs ventures. {\circledC} 2002 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.",
    keywords = "Decommissioning, Fisheries, Rigs-to-reefs, Stakeholders",
    author = "Baine, {M S P}",
    year = "2002",
    doi = "10.1006/jmsc.2002.1216",
    language = "English",
    volume = "59",
    pages = "277--280",
    journal = "ICES Journal of Marine Science",
    issn = "1054-3139",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",

    }

    The North Sea rigs-to-reefs debate. / Baine, M S P.

    In: ICES Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 59, 2002, p. 277-280.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The North Sea rigs-to-reefs debate

    AU - Baine, M S P

    PY - 2002

    Y1 - 2002

    N2 - Against a background where a sharp division of stakeholder opinion exists between proponents and opponents, I provide an evaluation of the rigs-to-reefs concept in the North Sea in terms of abandonment legislation, scientific foundation, and perceived acceptability to the environmental and fishing sectors. An analysis of the political situation suggests the need for a revision of the United Kingdom's Best Practicable Environmental Option process. Priority attention should be given to the issues of drill-cuttings piles and the long-term fate of reefs. Offshore reef creation, including deployment in conjunction with a "no fishing" policy, is assessed as politically sensitive and difficult to achieve. Finding supporting beneficiaries and solving cost implications are deemed critical to the planning of a nearshore reef programme. The importance of a genuine stakeholder dialogue process is stressed, as is the crucial role of fishermen to the success of rigs-to-reefs ventures. © 2002 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

    AB - Against a background where a sharp division of stakeholder opinion exists between proponents and opponents, I provide an evaluation of the rigs-to-reefs concept in the North Sea in terms of abandonment legislation, scientific foundation, and perceived acceptability to the environmental and fishing sectors. An analysis of the political situation suggests the need for a revision of the United Kingdom's Best Practicable Environmental Option process. Priority attention should be given to the issues of drill-cuttings piles and the long-term fate of reefs. Offshore reef creation, including deployment in conjunction with a "no fishing" policy, is assessed as politically sensitive and difficult to achieve. Finding supporting beneficiaries and solving cost implications are deemed critical to the planning of a nearshore reef programme. The importance of a genuine stakeholder dialogue process is stressed, as is the crucial role of fishermen to the success of rigs-to-reefs ventures. © 2002 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

    KW - Decommissioning

    KW - Fisheries

    KW - Rigs-to-reefs

    KW - Stakeholders

    U2 - 10.1006/jmsc.2002.1216

    DO - 10.1006/jmsc.2002.1216

    M3 - Article

    VL - 59

    SP - 277

    EP - 280

    JO - ICES Journal of Marine Science

    JF - ICES Journal of Marine Science

    SN - 1054-3139

    ER -