Despite the controversial discussion around the definition and extent of the role of interpreters in legal settings (Hale, 2008), academics, practisearchers and increasingly interpreter users seem to agree on the crucial role of legal interpreting for both institutional and non-institutional users. When a linguistic barrier exists, interaction in prisons, courtrooms, asylum hearings, or between police officers and victims, suspects or witnesses, relies on interpreters and is modified by the very bilingual and multicultural nature of the interpreter-mediated encounter. Legal interpreting is dependent upon legislative, political and socioeconomic changes, such as the adoption of interpreting regulations or changes in migration policies; and researchers are making admirable efforts for the professionalisation of legal interpreting. This review article describes the evolution of research on legal interpreting during the past ten years (2008-2017), and analyses the trends emerging and the focal points of research activity in the field. For the purposes of this review, publications on legal interpreting were compiled (including court, police, prison, asylum, immigration and military interpreting), and a database was created. Overall, 464 publications were collected and coded per setting and main theme, and reviewed for identification of salient themes and trends.
|Number of pages||24|
|Journal||Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito|
|Publication status||Published - 24 Jul 2018|
- legal interpreting
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'The last ten years of legal interpreting research (2008-2017): A review of research in the field of legal interpreting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- School of Social Sciences - Assistant Professor
- School of Social Sciences, Languages & Intercultural Studies - Assistant Professor
Person: Academic (Research & Teaching)