The influence of lithogenic material on particulate inorganic carbon measurements of coccolithophores in the bay of biscay

Chris J. Daniels, Toby Tyrrell, Alex J. Poulton, Laura Pettit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Following earlier data suggesting a decoupling between coccolithophore abundance and its suggested proxy, particulate inorganic carbon (PIC), we investigated this relationship in the Bay of Biscay (northwest European shelf), between December 2009 and July 2010. Coccolithophore abundance, coccolith calcite, and PIC were determined in surface waters (5-m depth) along a transect crossing the Bay. Emiliania huxleyi was the most abundant species of coccolithophore and the main contributor of coccolith calcite (55-64%). PIC ranged from 0.07 to 11.7 mmol C m-3, and coccolith calcite from 0.002 to 0.27 mmol C m-3. Total PIC exceeded coccolith calcite in all samples, with only ~ 11% of the PIC attributed to coccoliths. Coccolithophores alone could not account for the PIC concentrations measured. Lithogenic particulate matter, with calcite and dolomite components, was observed in samples across the route and decoupled the relationship between PIC and coccolithophore abundance. Presence of lithogenic material and Mesozoic fossil coccoliths in the samples implies sediment resuspension. These findings question the suitability of PIC as a proxy for coccolithophore abundance and dynamics, particularly on or near continental shelves, where the resuspension and lateral transport of lithogenic calcite may decouple the potential relationship between PIC and coccolithophores.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-153
Number of pages9
JournalLimnology and Oceanography
Volume57
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oceanography
  • Aquatic Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The influence of lithogenic material on particulate inorganic carbon measurements of coccolithophores in the bay of biscay'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this