The ineffectiveness of entrepreneurship policy: Is policy formulation to blame?

Norin Arshed*, Sara Carter, Colin Mason

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    130 Citations (Scopus)
    278 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Entrepreneurship policy has been criticised for its lack of effectiveness. Some scholars, such as Scott Shane in this journal, have argued that it is 'bad' public policy. But this simply begs the question why the legislative process should generate bad policy? To answer this question this study examines the UK's enterprise policy process in the 2009-2010 period. It suggests that a key factor for the ineffectiveness of policy is how it is formulated. This stage in the policy process is seldom visible to those outside of government departments and has been largely ignored by prior research. The application of institutional theory provides a detailed theoretical understanding of the actors and the process by which enterprise policy is formulated. We find that by opening up the 'black box' of enterprise policy formulation, the process is dominated by powerful actors who govern the process with their interests.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)639-659
    Number of pages21
    JournalSmall Business Economics
    Volume43
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2014

    Keywords

    • Enterprise policy
    • Formulation
    • Institutional theory
    • Institutional entrepreneur
    • Legitimacy
    • Power
    • Qualitative
    • INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP
    • SMALL BUSINESS
    • REGIONAL INNOVATION
    • UNITED-KINGDOM
    • PUBLIC-POLICY
    • SOCIAL SKILL
    • SMALL FIRMS
    • SUPPORT
    • ENTERPRISE
    • AGENCY

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The ineffectiveness of entrepreneurship policy: Is policy formulation to blame?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this