"The gong gong was beaten" - Adamorobe: a "deaf village" in Ghana and its marriage prohibition for deaf partners

Annelies Kusters*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)
119 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Adamorobe is a village in Ghana where the historical presence of a hereditary form of deafness resulted in a high number of deaf inhabitants. Over the centuries, a local sign language emerged, which is used between deaf and hearing people in everyday life, rendering Adamorobe into a unique place of inclusion of deaf people. However, in 1975, a law was introduced to reduce the number of deaf people in Adamorobe: deaf people cannot marry each other in order to avoid deaf offspring. In the long term, this law threatens the linguistic and cultural diversity in this village where the use of sign language is omnipresent and where deaf people are perceived as fully productive and worthy members of society. This article is structured around two sets of tensions in the village, Firstly, hearing people's acceptance and inclusion of the deaf inhabitants, versus the wish to live in a village with no (or less) deaf people. Secondly, there is a tension between deaf people's subjection to, and resistance against, the law, this is a tension that can be observed in the existence of relationships between deaf partners, and abortions when these unions lead to pregnancies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2765-2784
Number of pages20
JournalSustainability
Volume4
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • Abortions
  • Adamorobe
  • Deafness
  • Disability
  • Ghana
  • Heredity
  • Law
  • Marriage
  • Sign language
  • Stigma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '"The gong gong was beaten" - Adamorobe: a "deaf village" in Ghana and its marriage prohibition for deaf partners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this