The future of structural analysis teaching

I. M. May, R. D. Wood, G. Beer, D. Johnson

    Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

    Abstract

    Synopsis During the last two decades the emergence of low cost PCs with graphical user Interfaces combined with sophisticated structural analysis software has led to a radical change In the way structural analysis Is conducted. Computer analysis of structures has reached a sufficient level of maturity for the curriculum content of structural analysis courses to be questioned. To what extent should course content now focus on the theory and practice of computer analysis, possibly at the expense of hand calculation methods? Can courses be designed to embrace the opportunities afforded by computer analysis to enable an understanding of structural behaviour? Insofar as much hand calculation Is now unnecessary, Is it possible to Identify the fundamentals of structural theory that ensure correct modelling and checking of computer analysis? The paper discusses these issues and make some proposals for how theory of structures courses might be designed to take account of the need to understand how structures behave and how modern structural software should be used in a professional manner.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)33-37
    Number of pages5
    JournalThe Structural Engineer
    Volume81
    Issue number7
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2003

    Fingerprint

    Structural analysis
    Teaching
    Graphical user interfaces
    Curricula
    Costs

    Keywords

    • Calculations
    • Computers
    • Courses
    • Stiffness methods
    • Structural analysis
    • Teaching

    Cite this

    May, I. M., Wood, R. D., Beer, G., & Johnson, D. (2003). The future of structural analysis teaching. The Structural Engineer, 81(7), 33-37.
    May, I. M. ; Wood, R. D. ; Beer, G. ; Johnson, D. / The future of structural analysis teaching. In: The Structural Engineer. 2003 ; Vol. 81, No. 7. pp. 33-37.
    @article{04cbee840a9a4ea0ad6b038189b45451,
    title = "The future of structural analysis teaching",
    abstract = "Synopsis During the last two decades the emergence of low cost PCs with graphical user Interfaces combined with sophisticated structural analysis software has led to a radical change In the way structural analysis Is conducted. Computer analysis of structures has reached a sufficient level of maturity for the curriculum content of structural analysis courses to be questioned. To what extent should course content now focus on the theory and practice of computer analysis, possibly at the expense of hand calculation methods? Can courses be designed to embrace the opportunities afforded by computer analysis to enable an understanding of structural behaviour? Insofar as much hand calculation Is now unnecessary, Is it possible to Identify the fundamentals of structural theory that ensure correct modelling and checking of computer analysis? The paper discusses these issues and make some proposals for how theory of structures courses might be designed to take account of the need to understand how structures behave and how modern structural software should be used in a professional manner.",
    keywords = "Calculations, Computers, Courses, Stiffness methods, Structural analysis, Teaching",
    author = "May, {I. M.} and Wood, {R. D.} and G. Beer and D. Johnson",
    year = "2003",
    month = "4",
    day = "1",
    language = "English",
    volume = "81",
    pages = "33--37",
    journal = "The Structural Engineer",
    issn = "1466-5123",
    publisher = "Institution of Structural Engineers",
    number = "7",

    }

    May, IM, Wood, RD, Beer, G & Johnson, D 2003, 'The future of structural analysis teaching', The Structural Engineer, vol. 81, no. 7, pp. 33-37.

    The future of structural analysis teaching. / May, I. M.; Wood, R. D.; Beer, G.; Johnson, D.

    In: The Structural Engineer, Vol. 81, No. 7, 01.04.2003, p. 33-37.

    Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The future of structural analysis teaching

    AU - May, I. M.

    AU - Wood, R. D.

    AU - Beer, G.

    AU - Johnson, D.

    PY - 2003/4/1

    Y1 - 2003/4/1

    N2 - Synopsis During the last two decades the emergence of low cost PCs with graphical user Interfaces combined with sophisticated structural analysis software has led to a radical change In the way structural analysis Is conducted. Computer analysis of structures has reached a sufficient level of maturity for the curriculum content of structural analysis courses to be questioned. To what extent should course content now focus on the theory and practice of computer analysis, possibly at the expense of hand calculation methods? Can courses be designed to embrace the opportunities afforded by computer analysis to enable an understanding of structural behaviour? Insofar as much hand calculation Is now unnecessary, Is it possible to Identify the fundamentals of structural theory that ensure correct modelling and checking of computer analysis? The paper discusses these issues and make some proposals for how theory of structures courses might be designed to take account of the need to understand how structures behave and how modern structural software should be used in a professional manner.

    AB - Synopsis During the last two decades the emergence of low cost PCs with graphical user Interfaces combined with sophisticated structural analysis software has led to a radical change In the way structural analysis Is conducted. Computer analysis of structures has reached a sufficient level of maturity for the curriculum content of structural analysis courses to be questioned. To what extent should course content now focus on the theory and practice of computer analysis, possibly at the expense of hand calculation methods? Can courses be designed to embrace the opportunities afforded by computer analysis to enable an understanding of structural behaviour? Insofar as much hand calculation Is now unnecessary, Is it possible to Identify the fundamentals of structural theory that ensure correct modelling and checking of computer analysis? The paper discusses these issues and make some proposals for how theory of structures courses might be designed to take account of the need to understand how structures behave and how modern structural software should be used in a professional manner.

    KW - Calculations

    KW - Computers

    KW - Courses

    KW - Stiffness methods

    KW - Structural analysis

    KW - Teaching

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037388014&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Literature review

    VL - 81

    SP - 33

    EP - 37

    JO - The Structural Engineer

    JF - The Structural Engineer

    SN - 1466-5123

    IS - 7

    ER -

    May IM, Wood RD, Beer G, Johnson D. The future of structural analysis teaching. The Structural Engineer. 2003 Apr 1;81(7):33-37.