TY - JOUR
T1 - The future of ocean governance
AU - Haas, Bianca
AU - Mackay, Mary
AU - Novaglio, Camilla
AU - Fullbrook, Liam
AU - Murunga, Michael
AU - Sbrocchi, Carla
AU - McDonald, Jan
AU - McCormack, Phillipa C.
AU - Alexander, Karen
AU - Fudge, Maree
AU - Goldsworthy, Lyn
AU - Boschetti, Fabio
AU - Dutton, Ian
AU - Dutra, Leo
AU - McGee, Jeffrey
AU - Rousseau, Yannick
AU - Spain, Erica
AU - Stephenson, Robert
AU - Vince, Joanna
AU - Wilcox, Chris
AU - Haward, Marcus
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper is part of the ‘Future Seas’ initiative ( www.FutureSeas2030.org ), hosted by the Centre for Marine Socioecology at the University of Tasmania. This initiative delivers a series of journal articles addressing key challenges for the UN International Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development 2021–2030. The general concepts and methods applied in many of these papers were developed in large collaborative workshops involving more participants that are listed here as co-authors here, and we are grateful for their collective input. Funding for Future Seas was provided by the Centre for Marine Socioecology, IMAS, MENZIES and the College of Arts, Law and Education, and the College of Science and Engineering at UTAS, and Snowchange from Finland. We acknowledge support from a Research Enhancement Program grant from the DVCR Office at UTAS. We would like to thank Chief Jones and Sutje Hugu for their contribution to this paper. We would also like to thank Carolina Garcia and Danielle Smith for comments on earlier drafts. Thank you to Emily Ogier for providing an internal project review of an earlier draft and the anonymous reviews for improving the manuscript. We acknowledge and pay respect to the traditional owners and custodians of sea country all around the world and recognise their collective wisdom and knowledge of our oceans and coasts.
Funding Information:
This paper is part of the ?Future Seas? initiative (www.FutureSeas2030.org), hosted by the Centre for Marine Socioecology at the University of Tasmania. This initiative delivers a series of journal articles addressing key challenges for the UN International Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development 2021?2030. The general concepts and methods applied in many of these papers were developed in large collaborative workshops involving more participants that are listed here as co-authors here, and we are grateful for their collective input. Funding for Future Seas was provided by the Centre for Marine Socioecology, IMAS, MENZIES and the College of Arts, Law and Education, and the College of Science and Engineering at UTAS, and Snowchange from Finland. We acknowledge support from a Research Enhancement Program grant from the DVCR Office at UTAS. We would like to thank Chief Jones and Sutje Hugu for their contribution to this paper. We would also like to thank Carolina Garcia and Danielle Smith for comments on earlier drafts. Thank you to Emily Ogier for providing an internal project review of an earlier draft and the anonymous reviews for improving the manuscript. We acknowledge and pay respect to the traditional owners and custodians of sea country all around the world and recognise their collective wisdom and knowledge of our oceans and coasts.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Ocean governance is complex and influenced by multiple drivers and actors with different worldviews and goals. While governance encompasses many elements, in this paper we focus on the processes that operate within and between states, civil society and local communities, and the market, including industry. Specifically, in this paper, we address the question of how to move towards more sustainable ocean governance aligning with the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the UN Ocean Decade. We address three major risks to oceans that arise from governance-related issues: (1) the impacts of the overexploitation of marine resources; (2) inequitable distribution of access to and benefits from marine ecosystem services, and (3) inadequate or inappropriate adaptation to changing ocean conditions. The SDGs have been used as an underlying framework to develop these risks. We identify five drivers that may determine how ocean governance evolves, namely formal rules and institutions, evidence and knowledge-based decision-making, legitimacy of decision-making institutions, stakeholder engagement and participation, and empowering communities. These drivers were used to define two alternative futures by 2030: (a) ‘Business as Usual’—a continuation of current trajectories and (b) ‘More Sustainable Future’—optimistic, transformational, but technically achievable. We then identify what actions, as structured processes, can reduce the three major governance-related risks and lead to the More Sustainable Future. These actions relate to the process of co-creation and implementation of improved, comprehensive, and integrated management plans, enhancement of decision-making processes, and better anticipation and consideration of ambiguity and uncertainty.
AB - Ocean governance is complex and influenced by multiple drivers and actors with different worldviews and goals. While governance encompasses many elements, in this paper we focus on the processes that operate within and between states, civil society and local communities, and the market, including industry. Specifically, in this paper, we address the question of how to move towards more sustainable ocean governance aligning with the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the UN Ocean Decade. We address three major risks to oceans that arise from governance-related issues: (1) the impacts of the overexploitation of marine resources; (2) inequitable distribution of access to and benefits from marine ecosystem services, and (3) inadequate or inappropriate adaptation to changing ocean conditions. The SDGs have been used as an underlying framework to develop these risks. We identify five drivers that may determine how ocean governance evolves, namely formal rules and institutions, evidence and knowledge-based decision-making, legitimacy of decision-making institutions, stakeholder engagement and participation, and empowering communities. These drivers were used to define two alternative futures by 2030: (a) ‘Business as Usual’—a continuation of current trajectories and (b) ‘More Sustainable Future’—optimistic, transformational, but technically achievable. We then identify what actions, as structured processes, can reduce the three major governance-related risks and lead to the More Sustainable Future. These actions relate to the process of co-creation and implementation of improved, comprehensive, and integrated management plans, enhancement of decision-making processes, and better anticipation and consideration of ambiguity and uncertainty.
KW - Actors
KW - Agency
KW - Marine policy
KW - Resource management
KW - Sustainable development goals
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099390552&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11160-020-09631-x
DO - 10.1007/s11160-020-09631-x
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33456210
AN - SCOPUS:85099390552
SN - 0960-3166
VL - 32
SP - 253
EP - 270
JO - Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
JF - Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
ER -