The experience of type 2 diabetes self-management in adults with intellectual disabilities and their caregivers: A review of the literature using meta-aggregative synthesis and an appraisal of rigor

Andrew Maine*, Michael Brown, Adele Dickson, Maria Truesdale

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

People with intellectual disabilities (ID) experience significant barriers to diabetes self-management (DSM), yet there remains a paucity of research within this population. An overview of the literature on people with ID and their caregivers’ experiences of living with and self-managing type 2 diabetes is provided. Meta-aggregative methods were adopted to synthesize results, and an appraisal was reported of rigor. A total of eight studies met the inclusion criteria and four themes were extracted: (i) “Frustration over lifestyle adjustments,” (ii) “Limited understanding and inadequate educational resources,” (iii) “Limited training and knowledge in staff,” and (iv) “Potential for effective DSM with appropriate support.” Current support is inadequate to meet the needs of people with ID and their caregivers self-managing diabetes. Structured education to improve health literacy and diabetes knowledge in people with ID is required, together with training for caregivers which leads to a culture of nurturing autonomy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-267
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Intellectual Disabilities
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2020

Keywords

  • intellectual disabilities
  • meta-aggregation
  • self-management
  • type 2 diabetes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Professions (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The experience of type 2 diabetes self-management in adults with intellectual disabilities and their caregivers: A review of the literature using meta-aggregative synthesis and an appraisal of rigor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this