The Essential Elements of a Risk Governance Framework for Current and Future Nanotechnologies

Vicki Stone, Martin Führ, Peter H. Feindt, Hans Bouwmeester, Igor Linkov, Stefania Sabella, Finbarr Murphy, Kilian Bizer, C. Lang Tran, Marlene Ågerstrand, Carlos Fito, Torben Andersen, Diana Anderson, Enrico Bergamaschi, John W. Cherrie, Sue Cowan, Jean-Francois Dalemcourt, Michael Faure, Silke Gabbert, Agnieszka Gajewicz & 17 others Teresa F. Fernandes, Danail Hristozov, Helinor Jane Johnston, Terry C. Lansdown, Stefan Linder, Hans J. P. Marvin, Martin Mullins, Kai Purnhagen, Tomasz Puzyn, Araceli Sánchez-Jiménez, Janeck J. Scott-Fordsmand, George Streftaris, Martie van Tongeren, Nicolas H. Voelcker, George Voyiatzis, Spyros N. Yannopoulos, P. Marijn Poortvliet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Societies worldwide are investing considerable resources into the safe development and use of nanomaterials. Although each of these protective efforts is crucial for governing the risks of nanomaterials, they are insufficient in isolation. What is missing is a more integrative governance approach that goes beyond legislation. Development of this approach must be evidence based and involve key stakeholders to ensure acceptance by end users. The challenge is to develop a framework that coordinates the variety of actors involved in nanotechnology and civil society to facilitate consideration of the complex issues that occur in this rapidly evolving research and development area. Here, we propose three sets of essential elements required to generate an effective risk governance framework for nanomaterials. (1) Advanced tools to facilitate risk-based decision making, including an assessment of the needs of users regarding risk assessment, mitigation, and transfer. (2) An integrated model of predicted human behavior and decision making concerning nanomaterial risks. (3) Legal and other (nano-specific and general) regulatory requirements to ensure compliance and to stimulate proactive approaches to safety. The implementation of such an approach should facilitate and motivate good practice for the various stakeholders to allow the safe and sustainable future development of nanotechnology.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1321-1331
Number of pages11
JournalRisk Analysis
Volume38
Issue number7
Early online date14 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

Fingerprint

nanotechnology
stakeholder
decision making
governance approach
human behavior
civil society
research and development
compliance
legislation
risk assessment
mitigation
safety
resource

Cite this

Stone, V., Führ, M., Feindt, P. H., Bouwmeester, H., Linkov, I., Sabella, S., ... Poortvliet, P. M. (2018). The Essential Elements of a Risk Governance Framework for Current and Future Nanotechnologies. Risk Analysis, 38(7), 1321-1331. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12954
Stone, Vicki ; Führ, Martin ; Feindt, Peter H. ; Bouwmeester, Hans ; Linkov, Igor ; Sabella, Stefania ; Murphy, Finbarr ; Bizer, Kilian ; Tran, C. Lang ; Ågerstrand, Marlene ; Fito, Carlos ; Andersen, Torben ; Anderson, Diana ; Bergamaschi, Enrico ; Cherrie, John W. ; Cowan, Sue ; Dalemcourt, Jean-Francois ; Faure, Michael ; Gabbert, Silke ; Gajewicz, Agnieszka ; Fernandes, Teresa F. ; Hristozov, Danail ; Johnston, Helinor Jane ; Lansdown, Terry C. ; Linder, Stefan ; Marvin, Hans J. P. ; Mullins, Martin ; Purnhagen, Kai ; Puzyn, Tomasz ; Sánchez-Jiménez, Araceli ; Scott-Fordsmand, Janeck J. ; Streftaris, George ; van Tongeren, Martie ; Voelcker, Nicolas H. ; Voyiatzis, George ; Yannopoulos, Spyros N. ; Poortvliet, P. Marijn. / The Essential Elements of a Risk Governance Framework for Current and Future Nanotechnologies. In: Risk Analysis. 2018 ; Vol. 38, No. 7. pp. 1321-1331.
@article{249551bf647e4b07923f21982bf1fc03,
title = "The Essential Elements of a Risk Governance Framework for Current and Future Nanotechnologies",
abstract = "Societies worldwide are investing considerable resources into the safe development and use of nanomaterials. Although each of these protective efforts is crucial for governing the risks of nanomaterials, they are insufficient in isolation. What is missing is a more integrative governance approach that goes beyond legislation. Development of this approach must be evidence based and involve key stakeholders to ensure acceptance by end users. The challenge is to develop a framework that coordinates the variety of actors involved in nanotechnology and civil society to facilitate consideration of the complex issues that occur in this rapidly evolving research and development area. Here, we propose three sets of essential elements required to generate an effective risk governance framework for nanomaterials. (1) Advanced tools to facilitate risk-based decision making, including an assessment of the needs of users regarding risk assessment, mitigation, and transfer. (2) An integrated model of predicted human behavior and decision making concerning nanomaterial risks. (3) Legal and other (nano-specific and general) regulatory requirements to ensure compliance and to stimulate proactive approaches to safety. The implementation of such an approach should facilitate and motivate good practice for the various stakeholders to allow the safe and sustainable future development of nanotechnology.",
author = "Vicki Stone and Martin F{\"u}hr and Feindt, {Peter H.} and Hans Bouwmeester and Igor Linkov and Stefania Sabella and Finbarr Murphy and Kilian Bizer and Tran, {C. Lang} and Marlene {\AA}gerstrand and Carlos Fito and Torben Andersen and Diana Anderson and Enrico Bergamaschi and Cherrie, {John W.} and Sue Cowan and Jean-Francois Dalemcourt and Michael Faure and Silke Gabbert and Agnieszka Gajewicz and Fernandes, {Teresa F.} and Danail Hristozov and Johnston, {Helinor Jane} and Lansdown, {Terry C.} and Stefan Linder and Marvin, {Hans J. P.} and Martin Mullins and Kai Purnhagen and Tomasz Puzyn and Araceli S{\'a}nchez-Jim{\'e}nez and Scott-Fordsmand, {Janeck J.} and George Streftaris and {van Tongeren}, Martie and Voelcker, {Nicolas H.} and George Voyiatzis and Yannopoulos, {Spyros N.} and Poortvliet, {P. Marijn}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/risa.12954",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "1321--1331",
journal = "Risk Analysis",
issn = "0272-4332",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

Stone, V, Führ, M, Feindt, PH, Bouwmeester, H, Linkov, I, Sabella, S, Murphy, F, Bizer, K, Tran, CL, Ågerstrand, M, Fito, C, Andersen, T, Anderson, D, Bergamaschi, E, Cherrie, JW, Cowan, S, Dalemcourt, J-F, Faure, M, Gabbert, S, Gajewicz, A, Fernandes, TF, Hristozov, D, Johnston, HJ, Lansdown, TC, Linder, S, Marvin, HJP, Mullins, M, Purnhagen, K, Puzyn, T, Sánchez-Jiménez, A, Scott-Fordsmand, JJ, Streftaris, G, van Tongeren, M, Voelcker, NH, Voyiatzis, G, Yannopoulos, SN & Poortvliet, PM 2018, 'The Essential Elements of a Risk Governance Framework for Current and Future Nanotechnologies', Risk Analysis, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1321-1331. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12954

The Essential Elements of a Risk Governance Framework for Current and Future Nanotechnologies. / Stone, Vicki; Führ, Martin; Feindt, Peter H.; Bouwmeester, Hans; Linkov, Igor; Sabella, Stefania; Murphy, Finbarr; Bizer, Kilian; Tran, C. Lang; Ågerstrand, Marlene; Fito, Carlos; Andersen, Torben; Anderson, Diana; Bergamaschi, Enrico; Cherrie, John W.; Cowan, Sue; Dalemcourt, Jean-Francois; Faure, Michael; Gabbert, Silke; Gajewicz, Agnieszka; Fernandes, Teresa F.; Hristozov, Danail; Johnston, Helinor Jane; Lansdown, Terry C.; Linder, Stefan; Marvin, Hans J. P.; Mullins, Martin; Purnhagen, Kai; Puzyn, Tomasz; Sánchez-Jiménez, Araceli; Scott-Fordsmand, Janeck J.; Streftaris, George; van Tongeren, Martie; Voelcker, Nicolas H.; Voyiatzis, George; Yannopoulos, Spyros N.; Poortvliet, P. Marijn.

In: Risk Analysis, Vol. 38, No. 7, 07.2018, p. 1321-1331.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Essential Elements of a Risk Governance Framework for Current and Future Nanotechnologies

AU - Stone, Vicki

AU - Führ, Martin

AU - Feindt, Peter H.

AU - Bouwmeester, Hans

AU - Linkov, Igor

AU - Sabella, Stefania

AU - Murphy, Finbarr

AU - Bizer, Kilian

AU - Tran, C. Lang

AU - Ågerstrand, Marlene

AU - Fito, Carlos

AU - Andersen, Torben

AU - Anderson, Diana

AU - Bergamaschi, Enrico

AU - Cherrie, John W.

AU - Cowan, Sue

AU - Dalemcourt, Jean-Francois

AU - Faure, Michael

AU - Gabbert, Silke

AU - Gajewicz, Agnieszka

AU - Fernandes, Teresa F.

AU - Hristozov, Danail

AU - Johnston, Helinor Jane

AU - Lansdown, Terry C.

AU - Linder, Stefan

AU - Marvin, Hans J. P.

AU - Mullins, Martin

AU - Purnhagen, Kai

AU - Puzyn, Tomasz

AU - Sánchez-Jiménez, Araceli

AU - Scott-Fordsmand, Janeck J.

AU - Streftaris, George

AU - van Tongeren, Martie

AU - Voelcker, Nicolas H.

AU - Voyiatzis, George

AU - Yannopoulos, Spyros N.

AU - Poortvliet, P. Marijn

PY - 2018/7

Y1 - 2018/7

N2 - Societies worldwide are investing considerable resources into the safe development and use of nanomaterials. Although each of these protective efforts is crucial for governing the risks of nanomaterials, they are insufficient in isolation. What is missing is a more integrative governance approach that goes beyond legislation. Development of this approach must be evidence based and involve key stakeholders to ensure acceptance by end users. The challenge is to develop a framework that coordinates the variety of actors involved in nanotechnology and civil society to facilitate consideration of the complex issues that occur in this rapidly evolving research and development area. Here, we propose three sets of essential elements required to generate an effective risk governance framework for nanomaterials. (1) Advanced tools to facilitate risk-based decision making, including an assessment of the needs of users regarding risk assessment, mitigation, and transfer. (2) An integrated model of predicted human behavior and decision making concerning nanomaterial risks. (3) Legal and other (nano-specific and general) regulatory requirements to ensure compliance and to stimulate proactive approaches to safety. The implementation of such an approach should facilitate and motivate good practice for the various stakeholders to allow the safe and sustainable future development of nanotechnology.

AB - Societies worldwide are investing considerable resources into the safe development and use of nanomaterials. Although each of these protective efforts is crucial for governing the risks of nanomaterials, they are insufficient in isolation. What is missing is a more integrative governance approach that goes beyond legislation. Development of this approach must be evidence based and involve key stakeholders to ensure acceptance by end users. The challenge is to develop a framework that coordinates the variety of actors involved in nanotechnology and civil society to facilitate consideration of the complex issues that occur in this rapidly evolving research and development area. Here, we propose three sets of essential elements required to generate an effective risk governance framework for nanomaterials. (1) Advanced tools to facilitate risk-based decision making, including an assessment of the needs of users regarding risk assessment, mitigation, and transfer. (2) An integrated model of predicted human behavior and decision making concerning nanomaterial risks. (3) Legal and other (nano-specific and general) regulatory requirements to ensure compliance and to stimulate proactive approaches to safety. The implementation of such an approach should facilitate and motivate good practice for the various stakeholders to allow the safe and sustainable future development of nanotechnology.

U2 - 10.1111/risa.12954

DO - 10.1111/risa.12954

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 1321

EP - 1331

JO - Risk Analysis

JF - Risk Analysis

SN - 0272-4332

IS - 7

ER -