Abstract
Although the laws and professional codes encourage whistle-blowing, there is a lack of effective arrangements to guide external auditors on how to blow the whistle upon discovery of audit-related wrongdoing committed by audit colleagues. Using a four-stage participatory research method, we explore the professional judgement and decision-making process that external auditors go through as well as factors influencing their decisions to report wrongdoing by colleagues. The consensus results from the interviews conducted enable us to construct a whistle-blowing protocol that can be adopted in audit organisations and the profession.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 72-86 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | International Journal of Auditing |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 11 Dec 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Construction of a Whistle-Blowing Protocol for Audit Organisations: A Four-Stage Participatory Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver