The Construction of a Whistle-Blowing Protocol for Audit Organisations: A Four-Stage Participatory Approach

Philmore Alleyne, Roszaini Haniffa, Mohammad Hudaib

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Although the laws and professional codes encourage whistle-blowing, there is a lack of effective arrangements to guide external auditors on how to blow the whistle upon discovery of audit-related wrongdoing committed by audit colleagues. Using a four-stage participatory research method, we explore the professional judgement and decision-making process that external auditors go through as well as factors influencing their decisions to report wrongdoing by colleagues. The consensus results from the interviews conducted enable us to construct a whistle-blowing protocol that can be adopted in audit organisations and the profession.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)72-86
    Number of pages15
    JournalInternational Journal of Auditing
    Volume20
    Issue number1
    Early online date11 Dec 2015
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Construction of a Whistle-Blowing Protocol for Audit Organisations: A Four-Stage Participatory Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this