Abstract
Although the laws and professional codes encourage whistle-blowing, there is a lack of effective arrangements to guide external auditors on how to blow the whistle upon discovery of audit-related wrongdoing committed by audit colleagues. Using a four-stage participatory research method, we explore the professional judgement and decision-making process that external auditors go through as well as factors influencing their decisions to report wrongdoing by colleagues. The consensus results from the interviews conducted enable us to construct a whistle-blowing protocol that can be adopted in audit organisations and the profession.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 72-86 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | International Journal of Auditing |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 11 Dec 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2016 |