The 3Rs as a framework to support a 21st century approach for nanosafety assessment

Natalie Burden, Karin Aschberger, Qasim Chaudhry, Martin J. D. Clift, Shareen H. Doak, Paul Fowler, Helinor Jane Johnston, Robert Landsiedel, Joanna Rowland, Vicki Stone

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    63 Citations (Scopus)
    105 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Due to the plethora of nanomaterials being manufactured, it is crucial that their effects on human health are understood. It is not feasible to assess the safety of all nanomaterials using animal-based toxicity tests. There are also scientific, business, legislative and ethical drivers to reconsider the use of such toxicity tests. Utilising non-traditional methods has the potential to improve the human relevance of nanosafety assessment, reduce the numbers of animals that are used, and shift the paradigm to a ‘21st century’ approach that exploits recent scientific and technological advances. This article considers how application of the 3Rs principles can be used as a framework to support and guide this paradigm shift in the short, medium and long-term. Bringing the community together to facilitate the transition is necessary to ensure that tangible impacts are made on the efficiency and robustness of the nanosafety assessment process.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)10-13
    Number of pages4
    JournalNano Today
    Volume12
    Early online date25 Jul 2016
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The 3Rs as a framework to support a 21st century approach for nanosafety assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this