Teaching Reciprocity as the Foundation of Financial Economics

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Financial economics is widely regarded as "under-socialised" while the teaching of derivative pricing is often undertaken in the context of abstract mathematics. As the RCUK Academic Fellow in Financial Mathematics between 2006-2011 I was simultaneously concerned with two questions: what is the role of financial mathematics in financial crises and how to make the mathematics more relevant. The solution came out of studying the emergence of probability theory before 1700 in the context of commercial ethics where a risk less profit was seen as illicit. This resonated with the opening statement of Black and Scholes (1973), where it is argued that "it should not be possible to make sure profits". Johnson (2015) was the synthesis of these two ideas where it is argued that at the heart of the Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing is the concept of reciprocity, and this is developed in Johnson (2016) where it is argued that markets should be seen as centers of communicative, not strategic, action. Having outlined these ideas the talk will go on to describe how they are introduced to undergraduate and postgraduate students studying for exemptions from the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries exams focusing on the role of mathematical models in finance.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationPost Crash Economics
Subtitle of host publicationPluralist and Heterodox Ideas in Teaching and Research
EditorsOmar Feraboli, Carlo Morelli
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages199-230
Number of pages32
ISBN (Electronic)9783319658551
ISBN (Print)9783319658544
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

reciprocity
mathematics
Teaching
economics
pricing
profit
theory of probability
exemption
financial crisis
assets
finance
moral philosophy
market
student

Cite this

Johnson, T. (2018). Teaching Reciprocity as the Foundation of Financial Economics. In O. Feraboli, & C. Morelli (Eds.), Post Crash Economics: Pluralist and Heterodox Ideas in Teaching and Research (pp. 199-230). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65855-1_9
Johnson, Timothy. / Teaching Reciprocity as the Foundation of Financial Economics. Post Crash Economics: Pluralist and Heterodox Ideas in Teaching and Research. editor / Omar Feraboli ; Carlo Morelli. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. pp. 199-230
@inbook{4d45f27e4a2049e9af4c7a5d03665cf0,
title = "Teaching Reciprocity as the Foundation of Financial Economics",
abstract = "Financial economics is widely regarded as {"}under-socialised{"} while the teaching of derivative pricing is often undertaken in the context of abstract mathematics. As the RCUK Academic Fellow in Financial Mathematics between 2006-2011 I was simultaneously concerned with two questions: what is the role of financial mathematics in financial crises and how to make the mathematics more relevant. The solution came out of studying the emergence of probability theory before 1700 in the context of commercial ethics where a risk less profit was seen as illicit. This resonated with the opening statement of Black and Scholes (1973), where it is argued that {"}it should not be possible to make sure profits{"}. Johnson (2015) was the synthesis of these two ideas where it is argued that at the heart of the Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing is the concept of reciprocity, and this is developed in Johnson (2016) where it is argued that markets should be seen as centers of communicative, not strategic, action. Having outlined these ideas the talk will go on to describe how they are introduced to undergraduate and postgraduate students studying for exemptions from the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries exams focusing on the role of mathematical models in finance.",
author = "Timothy Johnson",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-65855-1_9",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319658544",
pages = "199--230",
editor = "Omar Feraboli and Carlo Morelli",
booktitle = "Post Crash Economics",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

}

Johnson, T 2018, Teaching Reciprocity as the Foundation of Financial Economics. in O Feraboli & C Morelli (eds), Post Crash Economics: Pluralist and Heterodox Ideas in Teaching and Research. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 199-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65855-1_9

Teaching Reciprocity as the Foundation of Financial Economics. / Johnson, Timothy.

Post Crash Economics: Pluralist and Heterodox Ideas in Teaching and Research. ed. / Omar Feraboli; Carlo Morelli. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. p. 199-230.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Teaching Reciprocity as the Foundation of Financial Economics

AU - Johnson, Timothy

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Financial economics is widely regarded as "under-socialised" while the teaching of derivative pricing is often undertaken in the context of abstract mathematics. As the RCUK Academic Fellow in Financial Mathematics between 2006-2011 I was simultaneously concerned with two questions: what is the role of financial mathematics in financial crises and how to make the mathematics more relevant. The solution came out of studying the emergence of probability theory before 1700 in the context of commercial ethics where a risk less profit was seen as illicit. This resonated with the opening statement of Black and Scholes (1973), where it is argued that "it should not be possible to make sure profits". Johnson (2015) was the synthesis of these two ideas where it is argued that at the heart of the Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing is the concept of reciprocity, and this is developed in Johnson (2016) where it is argued that markets should be seen as centers of communicative, not strategic, action. Having outlined these ideas the talk will go on to describe how they are introduced to undergraduate and postgraduate students studying for exemptions from the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries exams focusing on the role of mathematical models in finance.

AB - Financial economics is widely regarded as "under-socialised" while the teaching of derivative pricing is often undertaken in the context of abstract mathematics. As the RCUK Academic Fellow in Financial Mathematics between 2006-2011 I was simultaneously concerned with two questions: what is the role of financial mathematics in financial crises and how to make the mathematics more relevant. The solution came out of studying the emergence of probability theory before 1700 in the context of commercial ethics where a risk less profit was seen as illicit. This resonated with the opening statement of Black and Scholes (1973), where it is argued that "it should not be possible to make sure profits". Johnson (2015) was the synthesis of these two ideas where it is argued that at the heart of the Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing is the concept of reciprocity, and this is developed in Johnson (2016) where it is argued that markets should be seen as centers of communicative, not strategic, action. Having outlined these ideas the talk will go on to describe how they are introduced to undergraduate and postgraduate students studying for exemptions from the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries exams focusing on the role of mathematical models in finance.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-65855-1_9

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-65855-1_9

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319658544

SP - 199

EP - 230

BT - Post Crash Economics

A2 - Feraboli, Omar

A2 - Morelli, Carlo

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

ER -

Johnson T. Teaching Reciprocity as the Foundation of Financial Economics. In Feraboli O, Morelli C, editors, Post Crash Economics: Pluralist and Heterodox Ideas in Teaching and Research. Palgrave Macmillan. 2018. p. 199-230 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65855-1_9