Task and error analysis for battlefield technology evaluation: a battle management systems case study

Paul Salmon, Neville Stanton, Daniel Jenkins, Guy Walker, Laura Rafferty, Kirsten Revell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Human factors methods have a key role to play in the design and evaluation of battlefield technologies. This article presents an application of task analysis and error prediction methods for evaluating the usability of a new digitised battle management system. Based on data collected during live observation of an operational field trial of the battle management system, task and error prediction analyses were undertaken to identify usability issues. The analyses identified several issues, including general design flaws and a range of design-induced user errors. Recommendations for enhancing user interactions with the battle management system are specified. In closing, the key role that human factors methods have to play in the design and evaluation of battlefield technologies is discussed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)19-26
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Battlefield Technology
    Volume15
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012

    Fingerprint

    Error analysis
    Human engineering
    Defects

    Cite this

    Salmon, Paul ; Stanton, Neville ; Jenkins, Daniel ; Walker, Guy ; Rafferty, Laura ; Revell, Kirsten. / Task and error analysis for battlefield technology evaluation: a battle management systems case study. In: Journal of Battlefield Technology. 2012 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 19-26.
    @article{dd7c344b40174f0dbcc1ed45623d3c48,
    title = "Task and error analysis for battlefield technology evaluation: a battle management systems case study",
    abstract = "Human factors methods have a key role to play in the design and evaluation of battlefield technologies. This article presents an application of task analysis and error prediction methods for evaluating the usability of a new digitised battle management system. Based on data collected during live observation of an operational field trial of the battle management system, task and error prediction analyses were undertaken to identify usability issues. The analyses identified several issues, including general design flaws and a range of design-induced user errors. Recommendations for enhancing user interactions with the battle management system are specified. In closing, the key role that human factors methods have to play in the design and evaluation of battlefield technologies is discussed.",
    author = "Paul Salmon and Neville Stanton and Daniel Jenkins and Guy Walker and Laura Rafferty and Kirsten Revell",
    year = "2012",
    month = "3",
    language = "English",
    volume = "15",
    pages = "19--26",
    journal = "Journal of Battlefield Technology",
    issn = "1440-5113",
    number = "1",

    }

    Salmon, P, Stanton, N, Jenkins, D, Walker, G, Rafferty, L & Revell, K 2012, 'Task and error analysis for battlefield technology evaluation: a battle management systems case study', Journal of Battlefield Technology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 19-26.

    Task and error analysis for battlefield technology evaluation: a battle management systems case study. / Salmon, Paul; Stanton, Neville; Jenkins, Daniel; Walker, Guy; Rafferty, Laura; Revell, Kirsten.

    In: Journal of Battlefield Technology, Vol. 15, No. 1, 03.2012, p. 19-26.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Task and error analysis for battlefield technology evaluation: a battle management systems case study

    AU - Salmon, Paul

    AU - Stanton, Neville

    AU - Jenkins, Daniel

    AU - Walker, Guy

    AU - Rafferty, Laura

    AU - Revell, Kirsten

    PY - 2012/3

    Y1 - 2012/3

    N2 - Human factors methods have a key role to play in the design and evaluation of battlefield technologies. This article presents an application of task analysis and error prediction methods for evaluating the usability of a new digitised battle management system. Based on data collected during live observation of an operational field trial of the battle management system, task and error prediction analyses were undertaken to identify usability issues. The analyses identified several issues, including general design flaws and a range of design-induced user errors. Recommendations for enhancing user interactions with the battle management system are specified. In closing, the key role that human factors methods have to play in the design and evaluation of battlefield technologies is discussed.

    AB - Human factors methods have a key role to play in the design and evaluation of battlefield technologies. This article presents an application of task analysis and error prediction methods for evaluating the usability of a new digitised battle management system. Based on data collected during live observation of an operational field trial of the battle management system, task and error prediction analyses were undertaken to identify usability issues. The analyses identified several issues, including general design flaws and a range of design-induced user errors. Recommendations for enhancing user interactions with the battle management system are specified. In closing, the key role that human factors methods have to play in the design and evaluation of battlefield technologies is discussed.

    M3 - Article

    VL - 15

    SP - 19

    EP - 26

    JO - Journal of Battlefield Technology

    JF - Journal of Battlefield Technology

    SN - 1440-5113

    IS - 1

    ER -