TY - JOUR
T1 - Spatial relationships matter: How a spatial lens can illuminate barriers and motivators of natural flood management
AU - Tabas, Andrew David
AU - Pattison, Ian
AU - Peskett, Leo
AU - Beevers, Lindsay
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Flooding is a significant global risk that is being exacerbated by land use change and climate change. Natural Flood Management (NFM) is a group of practices that can help mitigate flood risk by slowing the flow, decreasing runoff rates, and storing water, and it can be effective at a variety of scales. NFM implementation is inherently spatial, as it requires upscaling as well as overcoming upstream-downstream spatial disconnections. However, existing literature on the barriers and motivators of NFM discusses the concept of space inconsistently. We review articles on the barriers and motivators of NFM implementation (n = 30) and find that the most common barriers are related to policies, knowledge, and funding; and the most common motivators are related to co-benefits, flood mitigation, and supportive policies. We use a spatial framework to analyse the barriers and motivators of NFM, finding that measuring NFM’s effectiveness, encouraging upstream-downstream cooperation, and considering visual impact and sense of place are essential for NFM upscaling. More consistency is needed in spatial thinking to move from discussions of the barriers of NFM to successful catchment-scale implementation. A holistic spatial framework for NFM implementation, with links to existing implementation frameworks, is proposed to facilitate NFM upscaling.
AB - Flooding is a significant global risk that is being exacerbated by land use change and climate change. Natural Flood Management (NFM) is a group of practices that can help mitigate flood risk by slowing the flow, decreasing runoff rates, and storing water, and it can be effective at a variety of scales. NFM implementation is inherently spatial, as it requires upscaling as well as overcoming upstream-downstream spatial disconnections. However, existing literature on the barriers and motivators of NFM discusses the concept of space inconsistently. We review articles on the barriers and motivators of NFM implementation (n = 30) and find that the most common barriers are related to policies, knowledge, and funding; and the most common motivators are related to co-benefits, flood mitigation, and supportive policies. We use a spatial framework to analyse the barriers and motivators of NFM, finding that measuring NFM’s effectiveness, encouraging upstream-downstream cooperation, and considering visual impact and sense of place are essential for NFM upscaling. More consistency is needed in spatial thinking to move from discussions of the barriers of NFM to successful catchment-scale implementation. A holistic spatial framework for NFM implementation, with links to existing implementation frameworks, is proposed to facilitate NFM upscaling.
KW - Natural Flood Management
KW - Nature-based solutions
KW - Space
KW - Place
KW - Flood risk management
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020922664
U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104259
DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104259
M3 - Article
SN - 1462-9011
VL - 174
JO - Environmental Science and Policy
JF - Environmental Science and Policy
M1 - 104259
ER -