Spatial relationships matter: How a spatial lens can illuminate barriers and motivators of natural flood management

Andrew David Tabas, Ian Pattison, Leo Peskett, Lindsay Beevers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Flooding is a significant global risk that is being exacerbated by land use change and climate change. Natural Flood Management (NFM) is a group of practices that can help mitigate flood risk by slowing the flow, decreasing runoff rates, and storing water, and it can be effective at a variety of scales. NFM implementation is inherently spatial, as it requires upscaling as well as overcoming upstream-downstream spatial disconnections. However, existing literature on the barriers and motivators of NFM discusses the concept of space inconsistently. We review articles on the barriers and motivators of NFM implementation (n = 30) and find that the most common barriers are related to policies, knowledge, and funding; and the most common motivators are related to co-benefits, flood mitigation, and supportive policies. We use a spatial framework to analyse the barriers and motivators of NFM, finding that measuring NFM’s effectiveness, encouraging upstream-downstream cooperation, and considering visual impact and sense of place are essential for NFM upscaling. More consistency is needed in spatial thinking to move from discussions of the barriers of NFM to successful catchment-scale implementation. A holistic spatial framework for NFM implementation, with links to existing implementation frameworks, is proposed to facilitate NFM upscaling.
Original languageEnglish
Article number104259
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume174
Early online date28 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • Natural Flood Management
  • Nature-based solutions
  • Space
  • Place
  • Flood risk management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spatial relationships matter: How a spatial lens can illuminate barriers and motivators of natural flood management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this