Spatial domain coding techniques for image sequences

P. J. Cordell, M. Soryani, R. J. Clarke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We are studying methods that operate in the spatial domain in which the edges can be easily identified and treated appropriately. Here we present two techniques. Each uses some form of segmentation either on the interframe signal, the intraframe signal or both, combined with some form of interpolation. The two techniques will be presented, and their relative merits discussed, together with a comparison with the DCT. The comparisons show that although in high bit rate coding the transform technique performs generally better, in low bit rate applications such as videotelephony the segmentation techniques produce more acceptable results. This is because, unlike DCT coding, segmented coding preserves the perceptually important image edges, which form a major part of the structure of the image, particularly at very low bit rates.

Original languageEnglish
JournalIEE Colloquium (Digest)
Issue number75
Publication statusPublished - 1990
EventColloquium - London, Engl
Duration: 11 May 199011 May 1990

Fingerprint

Interpolation

Cite this

Cordell, P. J., Soryani, M., & Clarke, R. J. (1990). Spatial domain coding techniques for image sequences. IEE Colloquium (Digest), (75).
Cordell, P. J. ; Soryani, M. ; Clarke, R. J. / Spatial domain coding techniques for image sequences. In: IEE Colloquium (Digest). 1990 ; No. 75.
@article{8f51e3b0a3154e7c9df7018d80d1ac9f,
title = "Spatial domain coding techniques for image sequences",
abstract = "We are studying methods that operate in the spatial domain in which the edges can be easily identified and treated appropriately. Here we present two techniques. Each uses some form of segmentation either on the interframe signal, the intraframe signal or both, combined with some form of interpolation. The two techniques will be presented, and their relative merits discussed, together with a comparison with the DCT. The comparisons show that although in high bit rate coding the transform technique performs generally better, in low bit rate applications such as videotelephony the segmentation techniques produce more acceptable results. This is because, unlike DCT coding, segmented coding preserves the perceptually important image edges, which form a major part of the structure of the image, particularly at very low bit rates.",
author = "Cordell, {P. J.} and M. Soryani and Clarke, {R. J.}",
year = "1990",
language = "English",
journal = "IEE Colloquium (Digest)",
issn = "0963-3308",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical Engineers",
number = "75",

}

Cordell, PJ, Soryani, M & Clarke, RJ 1990, 'Spatial domain coding techniques for image sequences', IEE Colloquium (Digest), no. 75.

Spatial domain coding techniques for image sequences. / Cordell, P. J.; Soryani, M.; Clarke, R. J.

In: IEE Colloquium (Digest), No. 75, 1990.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial domain coding techniques for image sequences

AU - Cordell, P. J.

AU - Soryani, M.

AU - Clarke, R. J.

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - We are studying methods that operate in the spatial domain in which the edges can be easily identified and treated appropriately. Here we present two techniques. Each uses some form of segmentation either on the interframe signal, the intraframe signal or both, combined with some form of interpolation. The two techniques will be presented, and their relative merits discussed, together with a comparison with the DCT. The comparisons show that although in high bit rate coding the transform technique performs generally better, in low bit rate applications such as videotelephony the segmentation techniques produce more acceptable results. This is because, unlike DCT coding, segmented coding preserves the perceptually important image edges, which form a major part of the structure of the image, particularly at very low bit rates.

AB - We are studying methods that operate in the spatial domain in which the edges can be easily identified and treated appropriately. Here we present two techniques. Each uses some form of segmentation either on the interframe signal, the intraframe signal or both, combined with some form of interpolation. The two techniques will be presented, and their relative merits discussed, together with a comparison with the DCT. The comparisons show that although in high bit rate coding the transform technique performs generally better, in low bit rate applications such as videotelephony the segmentation techniques produce more acceptable results. This is because, unlike DCT coding, segmented coding preserves the perceptually important image edges, which form a major part of the structure of the image, particularly at very low bit rates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025632189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

JO - IEE Colloquium (Digest)

JF - IEE Colloquium (Digest)

SN - 0963-3308

IS - 75

ER -