TY - JOUR
T1 - ‘Social stuff’ and all that jazz
T2 - Understanding the residual category of social sustainability
AU - Alexander, Karen A.
AU - Amundsen, Vilde S.
AU - Osmundsen, Tonje C.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work has been conducted as part of the SustainFish project (grant no. 254841 ) and the SoLic project (grant no. 295114 ), both funded by the Norwegian Research Council .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - Recently we have seen a substantial increase in pressure for industries, such as aquaculture, to become more sustainable. When it comes to practical attempts to operationalise sustainable development, however, the ‘social stuff’ is often neglected. In this paper, we provide a detailed exploration of how the concept of social sustainability is operationalised (and therefore understood) within the aquaculture certification context. We found that a) certification schemes do address social sustainability, but relevant indicators mostly focus on workers’ rights, or link directly back to environmental sustainability (through the consequences of environmental impact on humans); and b) the actions required often add little over and above existing legal requirements. Essentially, aquaculture sustainability certification schemes have not (yet) taken the opportunity to further shape our understanding of what social sustainability means, or how it is practiced. The consequence of this may be the impression that industries are truly sustainable, just because they have obtained sustainability certification.
AB - Recently we have seen a substantial increase in pressure for industries, such as aquaculture, to become more sustainable. When it comes to practical attempts to operationalise sustainable development, however, the ‘social stuff’ is often neglected. In this paper, we provide a detailed exploration of how the concept of social sustainability is operationalised (and therefore understood) within the aquaculture certification context. We found that a) certification schemes do address social sustainability, but relevant indicators mostly focus on workers’ rights, or link directly back to environmental sustainability (through the consequences of environmental impact on humans); and b) the actions required often add little over and above existing legal requirements. Essentially, aquaculture sustainability certification schemes have not (yet) taken the opportunity to further shape our understanding of what social sustainability means, or how it is practiced. The consequence of this may be the impression that industries are truly sustainable, just because they have obtained sustainability certification.
KW - Aquaculture
KW - Certification
KW - Indicators
KW - Social
KW - Sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086399374&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.003
DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85086399374
SN - 1462-9011
VL - 112
SP - 61
EP - 68
JO - Environmental Science and Policy
JF - Environmental Science and Policy
ER -