TY - JOUR
T1 - Simulated biological fluids - a systematic review of their biological relevance and use in relation to inhalation toxicology of particles and fibres
AU - Innes, Emma
AU - Yiu, Humphrey H. P.
AU - McLean, Polly
AU - Brown, William
AU - Boyles, Matthew
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge and thank the European Insulation Manufacturers Association (EURIMA) for funding this work, and Chris Bolton (Institute of Occupational Medicine) for constructing the figures within this review. We also would like to thank the following people for providing valuable feedback on an early version of this review, and sharing their own experience with dissolution testing: Mette Solvang (ROCKWOOL International A/S), Christoph Koch (ROCKWOOL International A/S), Eric Pezennec (Knauf Insulation), Natasha Drnovsek (Knauf Insulation), and Nera Mascaraque (Ursa). This manuscript was also improved by insightful comments from the two reviewers selected by the Editor and anonymous to the authors. Their peer-review comments are gratefully acknowledged.
Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge and thank the European Insulation Manufacturers Association (EURIMA) for funding this work, and Chris Bolton (Institute of Occupational Medicine) for constructing the figures within this review. We also would like to thank the following people for providing valuable feedback on an early version of this review, and sharing their own experience with dissolution testing: Mette Solvang (ROCKWOOL International A/S), Christoph Koch (ROCKWOOL International A/S), Eric Pezennec (Knauf Insulation), Natasha Drnovsek (Knauf Insulation), and Nera Mascaraque (Ursa). This manuscript was also improved by insightful comments from the two reviewers selected by the Editor and anonymous to the authors. Their peer-review comments are gratefully acknowledged.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The use of simulated biological fluids (SBFs) is a promising in vitro technique to better understand the release mechanisms and possible in vivo behaviour of materials, including fibres, metal-containing particles and nanomaterials. Applications of SBFs in dissolution tests allow a measure of material biopersistence or, conversely, bioaccessibility that in turn can provide a useful inference of a materials biodistribution, its acute and long-term toxicity, as well as its pathogenicity. Given the wide range of SBFs reported in the literature, a review was conducted, with a focus on fluids used to replicate environments that may be encountered upon material inhalation, including extracellular and intracellular compartments. The review aims to identify when a fluid design can replicate realistic biological conditions, demonstrate operation validation, and/or provide robustness and reproducibility. The studies examined highlight simulated lung fluids (SLFs) that have been shown to suitably replicate physiological conditions, and identify specific components that play a pivotal role in dissolution mechanisms and biological activity; including organic molecules, redox-active species and chelating agents. Material dissolution was not always driven by pH, and likewise not only driven by SLF composition; specific materials and formulations correspond to specific dissolution mechanisms. It is recommended that SLF developments focus on biological predictivity and if not practical, on better biological mimicry, as such an approach ensures results are more likely to reflect in vivo behaviour regardless of the material under investigation.
AB - The use of simulated biological fluids (SBFs) is a promising in vitro technique to better understand the release mechanisms and possible in vivo behaviour of materials, including fibres, metal-containing particles and nanomaterials. Applications of SBFs in dissolution tests allow a measure of material biopersistence or, conversely, bioaccessibility that in turn can provide a useful inference of a materials biodistribution, its acute and long-term toxicity, as well as its pathogenicity. Given the wide range of SBFs reported in the literature, a review was conducted, with a focus on fluids used to replicate environments that may be encountered upon material inhalation, including extracellular and intracellular compartments. The review aims to identify when a fluid design can replicate realistic biological conditions, demonstrate operation validation, and/or provide robustness and reproducibility. The studies examined highlight simulated lung fluids (SLFs) that have been shown to suitably replicate physiological conditions, and identify specific components that play a pivotal role in dissolution mechanisms and biological activity; including organic molecules, redox-active species and chelating agents. Material dissolution was not always driven by pH, and likewise not only driven by SLF composition; specific materials and formulations correspond to specific dissolution mechanisms. It is recommended that SLF developments focus on biological predictivity and if not practical, on better biological mimicry, as such an approach ensures results are more likely to reflect in vivo behaviour regardless of the material under investigation.
KW - Bioaccessibility
KW - New Approach Methodologies (NAMs)
KW - bioelution
KW - biopersistence
KW - inhalation
KW - in vitro
KW - lung fluid
KW - predictive toxicity
KW - simulated biological fluids
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105226399&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10408444.2021.1903386
DO - 10.1080/10408444.2021.1903386
M3 - Article
C2 - 33905298
SN - 1040-8444
VL - 51
SP - 217
EP - 248
JO - Critical Reviews in Toxicology
JF - Critical Reviews in Toxicology
IS - 3
ER -