Seven key investments for health equity across the lifecourse

Scotland versus the rest of the UK

John Frank, Catherine Bromley, Larry Doi, Michelle Estrade, Ruth Jepson, John McAteer, Tony Robertson, Morag Treanor, Andrew Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

While widespread lip service is given in the UK to the social determinants of health (SDoH), there are few published comparisons of how the UK's devolved jurisdictions ‘stack up’, in terms of implementing SDoH-based policies and programmes, to improve health equity over the life-course. Based on recent SDoH publications, seven key societal-level investments are suggested, across the life-course, for increasing health equity by socioeconomic position (SEP). We present hard-to-find comparable analyses of routinely collected data to gauge the relative extent to which these investments have been pursued and achieved expected goals in Scotland, as compared with England and Wales, in recent decades. Despite Scotland's longstanding explicit goal of reducing health inequalities, it has recently been doing slightly better than England and Wales on only one broad indicator of health-equity-related investments: childhood poverty. However, on the following indicators of other ‘best investments for health equity’, Scotland has not achieved demonstrably more equitable outcomes by SEP than the rest of the UK: infant mortality and teenage pregnancy rates; early childhood education implementation; standardised educational attainment after primary/secondary school; health care system access and performance; protection of the population from potentially hazardous patterns of food, drink and gambling use; unemployment. Although Scotland did not choose independence on September 18th, 2014, it could still (under the planned increased devolution of powers from Westminster) choose to increase investments in the underperforming categories of interventions for health equity listed above. However, such discussion is largely absent from the current post-referendum debate. Without further significant investments in such policies and programmes, Scotland is unlikely to achieve the ‘healthier, fairer society’ referred to in the current Scottish Government's official aspirations for the nation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)136-146
Number of pages11
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume140
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2015

Keywords

  • Policies to reduce health inequalities
  • Scotland
  • England and Wales
  • United Kingdom
  • Lifecourse epidemiology
  • Public health

Cite this

Frank, J., Bromley, C., Doi, L., Estrade, M., Jepson, R., McAteer, J., ... Williams, A. (2015). Seven key investments for health equity across the lifecourse: Scotland versus the rest of the UK. Social Science and Medicine, 140, 136-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.007
Frank, John ; Bromley, Catherine ; Doi, Larry ; Estrade, Michelle ; Jepson, Ruth ; McAteer, John ; Robertson, Tony ; Treanor, Morag ; Williams, Andrew. / Seven key investments for health equity across the lifecourse : Scotland versus the rest of the UK. In: Social Science and Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 140. pp. 136-146.
@article{f85227117dd3423798292aa2ff58ce45,
title = "Seven key investments for health equity across the lifecourse: Scotland versus the rest of the UK",
abstract = "While widespread lip service is given in the UK to the social determinants of health (SDoH), there are few published comparisons of how the UK's devolved jurisdictions ‘stack up’, in terms of implementing SDoH-based policies and programmes, to improve health equity over the life-course. Based on recent SDoH publications, seven key societal-level investments are suggested, across the life-course, for increasing health equity by socioeconomic position (SEP). We present hard-to-find comparable analyses of routinely collected data to gauge the relative extent to which these investments have been pursued and achieved expected goals in Scotland, as compared with England and Wales, in recent decades. Despite Scotland's longstanding explicit goal of reducing health inequalities, it has recently been doing slightly better than England and Wales on only one broad indicator of health-equity-related investments: childhood poverty. However, on the following indicators of other ‘best investments for health equity’, Scotland has not achieved demonstrably more equitable outcomes by SEP than the rest of the UK: infant mortality and teenage pregnancy rates; early childhood education implementation; standardised educational attainment after primary/secondary school; health care system access and performance; protection of the population from potentially hazardous patterns of food, drink and gambling use; unemployment. Although Scotland did not choose independence on September 18th, 2014, it could still (under the planned increased devolution of powers from Westminster) choose to increase investments in the underperforming categories of interventions for health equity listed above. However, such discussion is largely absent from the current post-referendum debate. Without further significant investments in such policies and programmes, Scotland is unlikely to achieve the ‘healthier, fairer society’ referred to in the current Scottish Government's official aspirations for the nation.",
keywords = "Policies to reduce health inequalities, Scotland, England and Wales, United Kingdom, Lifecourse epidemiology, Public health",
author = "John Frank and Catherine Bromley and Larry Doi and Michelle Estrade and Ruth Jepson and John McAteer and Tony Robertson and Morag Treanor and Andrew Williams",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.007",
language = "English",
volume = "140",
pages = "136--146",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Frank, J, Bromley, C, Doi, L, Estrade, M, Jepson, R, McAteer, J, Robertson, T, Treanor, M & Williams, A 2015, 'Seven key investments for health equity across the lifecourse: Scotland versus the rest of the UK', Social Science and Medicine, vol. 140, pp. 136-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.007

Seven key investments for health equity across the lifecourse : Scotland versus the rest of the UK. / Frank, John; Bromley, Catherine; Doi, Larry; Estrade, Michelle; Jepson, Ruth; McAteer, John; Robertson, Tony; Treanor, Morag; Williams, Andrew.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 140, 09.2015, p. 136-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seven key investments for health equity across the lifecourse

T2 - Scotland versus the rest of the UK

AU - Frank, John

AU - Bromley, Catherine

AU - Doi, Larry

AU - Estrade, Michelle

AU - Jepson, Ruth

AU - McAteer, John

AU - Robertson, Tony

AU - Treanor, Morag

AU - Williams, Andrew

PY - 2015/9

Y1 - 2015/9

N2 - While widespread lip service is given in the UK to the social determinants of health (SDoH), there are few published comparisons of how the UK's devolved jurisdictions ‘stack up’, in terms of implementing SDoH-based policies and programmes, to improve health equity over the life-course. Based on recent SDoH publications, seven key societal-level investments are suggested, across the life-course, for increasing health equity by socioeconomic position (SEP). We present hard-to-find comparable analyses of routinely collected data to gauge the relative extent to which these investments have been pursued and achieved expected goals in Scotland, as compared with England and Wales, in recent decades. Despite Scotland's longstanding explicit goal of reducing health inequalities, it has recently been doing slightly better than England and Wales on only one broad indicator of health-equity-related investments: childhood poverty. However, on the following indicators of other ‘best investments for health equity’, Scotland has not achieved demonstrably more equitable outcomes by SEP than the rest of the UK: infant mortality and teenage pregnancy rates; early childhood education implementation; standardised educational attainment after primary/secondary school; health care system access and performance; protection of the population from potentially hazardous patterns of food, drink and gambling use; unemployment. Although Scotland did not choose independence on September 18th, 2014, it could still (under the planned increased devolution of powers from Westminster) choose to increase investments in the underperforming categories of interventions for health equity listed above. However, such discussion is largely absent from the current post-referendum debate. Without further significant investments in such policies and programmes, Scotland is unlikely to achieve the ‘healthier, fairer society’ referred to in the current Scottish Government's official aspirations for the nation.

AB - While widespread lip service is given in the UK to the social determinants of health (SDoH), there are few published comparisons of how the UK's devolved jurisdictions ‘stack up’, in terms of implementing SDoH-based policies and programmes, to improve health equity over the life-course. Based on recent SDoH publications, seven key societal-level investments are suggested, across the life-course, for increasing health equity by socioeconomic position (SEP). We present hard-to-find comparable analyses of routinely collected data to gauge the relative extent to which these investments have been pursued and achieved expected goals in Scotland, as compared with England and Wales, in recent decades. Despite Scotland's longstanding explicit goal of reducing health inequalities, it has recently been doing slightly better than England and Wales on only one broad indicator of health-equity-related investments: childhood poverty. However, on the following indicators of other ‘best investments for health equity’, Scotland has not achieved demonstrably more equitable outcomes by SEP than the rest of the UK: infant mortality and teenage pregnancy rates; early childhood education implementation; standardised educational attainment after primary/secondary school; health care system access and performance; protection of the population from potentially hazardous patterns of food, drink and gambling use; unemployment. Although Scotland did not choose independence on September 18th, 2014, it could still (under the planned increased devolution of powers from Westminster) choose to increase investments in the underperforming categories of interventions for health equity listed above. However, such discussion is largely absent from the current post-referendum debate. Without further significant investments in such policies and programmes, Scotland is unlikely to achieve the ‘healthier, fairer society’ referred to in the current Scottish Government's official aspirations for the nation.

KW - Policies to reduce health inequalities

KW - Scotland

KW - England and Wales

KW - United Kingdom

KW - Lifecourse epidemiology

KW - Public health

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.007

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.007

M3 - Article

VL - 140

SP - 136

EP - 146

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -