Service-life performance of reinforced concrete structures in corrosive environments

Dimitry Val, Leonid Chernin

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Reinforced concrete (RC) structures in marine environments are susceptible to deterioration caused by corrosion of reinforcing steel. Various measures can be employed to protect RC structures against corrosion and prevent deterioration. The measures increase the initial cost of a RC structure but reduce costs associated with its future service life. Thus, a cost-effective solution can only be determined on a life-cycle cost basis. Obviously, results of a life-cycle cost analysis depend on the predictive models used to describe corrosion initiation, propagation, and corresponding deterioration. The paper examines the influence of various predictive models on results of life-cycle cost analysis. Serviceability failure due to excessive corrosion-induced cracking is considered. © 2008 Taylor & Francis Group, London.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationLife-Cycle Civil Engineering
    Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering, Varenna, Lake Como, Italy, June 10-14, 2008
    EditorsFabio Biondini, Dan M Frangopol
    Place of PublicationBoca Raton
    PublisherCRC Press
    Pages247-252
    Number of pages6
    ISBN (Print)9780415468572
    Publication statusPublished - 2008
    EventFirst International Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering - Varenna, Lake Como, Italy
    Duration: 11 Jun 200814 Jun 2008

    Conference

    ConferenceFirst International Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering
    Abbreviated titleIALCCE '08
    CountryItaly
    CityVarenna, Lake Como
    Period11/06/0814/06/08

    Keywords

    • CYCLE COST

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Service-life performance of reinforced concrete structures in corrosive environments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this