Rights, needs and stigma: a comparison of homelessness policy in Scotland and Ireland

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This paper considers the contrasting approaches to homelessness
    in Scotland and the Republic of Ireland. Scotland has developed a strong legal
    safety net for homeless households, which in effect now gives the vast majority
    of homeless households an individually enforceable legal right to settled
    housing. This approach has attracted international recognition, reflecting an
    emerging consensus that ‘rights-based approaches’ offer the best response
    to homelessness. In Ireland, homelessness policy has also become a focal
    point for reform. A rights-based approach has been rejected, however, in
    favour of a ‘social partnership’ model that seeks to build consensus and
    develop a ‘problem solving approach’ among key stakeholders. Drawing on
    primary research with national experts, service providers and homeless men
    in both jurisdictions, this paper considers whether legal rights better meet the
    housing needs of homeless men than alternative approaches and whether they
    help mitigate the stigma of homelessness. It is argued that rights-based
    approaches crowd out alternative policy objectives, providing a blunt but
    effective tool in prioritising housing needs, and help minimise stigma by casting
    homeless people as rights-bearers with legitimate entitlements.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages41-68
    Number of pages28
    JournalEuropean Journal of Homelessness
    Volume7
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013

    Fingerprint

    homelessness
    Ireland
    housing
    social partnership
    international recognition
    service provider
    jurisdiction
    republic
    stakeholder
    expert
    reform

    Keywords

    • Homelessness
    • Right to housing
    • Access to housing
    • Social Housing
    • Scotland
    • Ireland

    Cite this

    @article{eb0d9af7248b420982bc3c8c278866a8,
    title = "Rights, needs and stigma: a comparison of homelessness policy in Scotland and Ireland",
    abstract = "This paper considers the contrasting approaches to homelessness in Scotland and the Republic of Ireland. Scotland has developed a strong legal safety net for homeless households, which in effect now gives the vast majority of homeless households an individually enforceable legal right to settled housing. This approach has attracted international recognition, reflecting an emerging consensus that ‘rights-based approaches’ offer the best response to homelessness. In Ireland, homelessness policy has also become a focal point for reform. A rights-based approach has been rejected, however, in favour of a ‘social partnership’ model that seeks to build consensus and develop a ‘problem solving approach’ among key stakeholders. Drawing on primary research with national experts, service providers and homeless men in both jurisdictions, this paper considers whether legal rights better meet the housing needs of homeless men than alternative approaches and whether they help mitigate the stigma of homelessness. It is argued that rights-based approaches crowd out alternative policy objectives, providing a blunt but effective tool in prioritising housing needs, and help minimise stigma by casting homeless people as rights-bearers with legitimate entitlements.",
    keywords = "Homelessness, Right to housing , Access to housing, Social Housing, Scotland, Ireland",
    author = "Beth Watts",
    year = "2013",
    month = "8",
    language = "English",
    volume = "7",
    pages = "41--68",
    journal = "European Journal of Homelessness",
    issn = "2030-2762",
    number = "1",

    }

    Rights, needs and stigma : a comparison of homelessness policy in Scotland and Ireland. / Watts, Beth.

    In: European Journal of Homelessness, Vol. 7, No. 1, 08.2013, p. 41-68.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Rights, needs and stigma

    T2 - European Journal of Homelessness

    AU - Watts, Beth

    PY - 2013/8

    Y1 - 2013/8

    N2 - This paper considers the contrasting approaches to homelessness in Scotland and the Republic of Ireland. Scotland has developed a strong legal safety net for homeless households, which in effect now gives the vast majority of homeless households an individually enforceable legal right to settled housing. This approach has attracted international recognition, reflecting an emerging consensus that ‘rights-based approaches’ offer the best response to homelessness. In Ireland, homelessness policy has also become a focal point for reform. A rights-based approach has been rejected, however, in favour of a ‘social partnership’ model that seeks to build consensus and develop a ‘problem solving approach’ among key stakeholders. Drawing on primary research with national experts, service providers and homeless men in both jurisdictions, this paper considers whether legal rights better meet the housing needs of homeless men than alternative approaches and whether they help mitigate the stigma of homelessness. It is argued that rights-based approaches crowd out alternative policy objectives, providing a blunt but effective tool in prioritising housing needs, and help minimise stigma by casting homeless people as rights-bearers with legitimate entitlements.

    AB - This paper considers the contrasting approaches to homelessness in Scotland and the Republic of Ireland. Scotland has developed a strong legal safety net for homeless households, which in effect now gives the vast majority of homeless households an individually enforceable legal right to settled housing. This approach has attracted international recognition, reflecting an emerging consensus that ‘rights-based approaches’ offer the best response to homelessness. In Ireland, homelessness policy has also become a focal point for reform. A rights-based approach has been rejected, however, in favour of a ‘social partnership’ model that seeks to build consensus and develop a ‘problem solving approach’ among key stakeholders. Drawing on primary research with national experts, service providers and homeless men in both jurisdictions, this paper considers whether legal rights better meet the housing needs of homeless men than alternative approaches and whether they help mitigate the stigma of homelessness. It is argued that rights-based approaches crowd out alternative policy objectives, providing a blunt but effective tool in prioritising housing needs, and help minimise stigma by casting homeless people as rights-bearers with legitimate entitlements.

    KW - Homelessness

    KW - Right to housing

    KW - Access to housing

    KW - Social Housing

    KW - Scotland

    KW - Ireland

    M3 - Article

    VL - 7

    SP - 41

    EP - 68

    JO - European Journal of Homelessness

    JF - European Journal of Homelessness

    SN - 2030-2762

    IS - 1

    ER -