Reflexivity: recursion and relationality in organizational research processes

Paul Hibbert, Christine Coupland, Robert Macintosh

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    19 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose – The paper seeks to support a better understanding of the types (or processes) of reflexivity which may be involved in the practice of organizational research, and the implications of reflexive practice for organizational researchers.

    Design/methodology/approach – A characterization of reflexivity as a process is developed from extant research, in four steps. First, the principal dimensions of reflexivity – reflection and recursion – are identified and delineated. Second, recursion is shown to have two modes, active and passive. Third, reflection is shown to have both closed, self-guided and open, relational modes. Fourth, through integrating the detailed characterizations of each of the dimensions, different types of reflexivity are identified and defined.

    Findings – The paper shows how different types of reflexivity may be experienced sequentially, as a progressive process, by organizational researchers. Implications for research practice are derived from a consideration of this process.

    Originality/value – The paper develops a novel conceptualization of reflexivity as a process with individual and relational aspects. This conceptualization supports important insights for the conduct and legitimation of reflexive research.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)47-62
    JournalQualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal
    Volume5
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reflexivity: recursion and relationality in organizational research processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this