TY - JOUR
T1 - REDD+, transformational change and the promise of performance-based payments: a qualitative comparative analysis
AU - Brockhaus, Maria
AU - Korhonen-Kurki, Kaisa
AU - Sehring, Jenniver
AU - Di Gregorio, Monica
AU - Assembe-Mvondo, Samuel
AU - Babon, Andrea
AU - Bekele, Melaku
AU - Gebara, Maria Fernanda
AU - Khatri, Dil Bahadur
AU - Kambire, Hermann W.
AU - Kengoum, Felicien
AU - Kweka, Demetrius
AU - Menton, Mary
AU - Moeliono, Moira
AU - Paudel, Naya Sharma
AU - Pham, Thuy Thu
AU - Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja
AU - Sitoe, Almeida
AU - Wunder, Sven
AU - Zida, Mathurin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2017/8/18
Y1 - 2017/8/18
N2 - Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) has emerged as a promising climate change mitigation mechanism in developing countries. This article examines the national political context in 13 REDD+ countries in order to identify the enabling conditions for achieving progress with the implementation of countries’ REDD+ policies and measures. The analysis builds on a qualitative comparative analysis of various countries’ progress with REDD+ conducted in 12 REDD+ countries in 2012, which highlighted the importance of factors such as already initiated policy change, and the presence of coalitions calling for broader policy change. A follow-up survey in 2014 was considered timely because the REDD+ policy arena, at the international and country levels, is highly dynamic and undergoes constant evolution, which affects progress with REDD+ policy-making and implementation. Furthermore, we will now examine whether the ‘promise’ of performance-based funds has played a role in enabling the establishment of REDD+. The results show a set of enabling conditions and characteristics of the policy process under which REDD+ policies can be established. The study finds that the existence of broader policy change, and availability of performance-based funding in combination with strong national ownership of the REDD+ policy process, may help guide other countries seeking to formulate REDD+ policies that are likely to deliver efficient, effective and equitable outcomes.
AB - Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) has emerged as a promising climate change mitigation mechanism in developing countries. This article examines the national political context in 13 REDD+ countries in order to identify the enabling conditions for achieving progress with the implementation of countries’ REDD+ policies and measures. The analysis builds on a qualitative comparative analysis of various countries’ progress with REDD+ conducted in 12 REDD+ countries in 2012, which highlighted the importance of factors such as already initiated policy change, and the presence of coalitions calling for broader policy change. A follow-up survey in 2014 was considered timely because the REDD+ policy arena, at the international and country levels, is highly dynamic and undergoes constant evolution, which affects progress with REDD+ policy-making and implementation. Furthermore, we will now examine whether the ‘promise’ of performance-based funds has played a role in enabling the establishment of REDD+. The results show a set of enabling conditions and characteristics of the policy process under which REDD+ policies can be established. The study finds that the existence of broader policy change, and availability of performance-based funding in combination with strong national ownership of the REDD+ policy process, may help guide other countries seeking to formulate REDD+ policies that are likely to deliver efficient, effective and equitable outcomes.
KW - avoided deforestation
KW - climate change policies
KW - country studies
KW - developing countries
KW - international comparison
KW - REDD
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973144035&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14693062.2016.1169392
DO - 10.1080/14693062.2016.1169392
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84973144035
SN - 1469-3062
VL - 17
SP - 708
EP - 730
JO - Climate Policy
JF - Climate Policy
IS - 6
ER -