Abstract
The activities of formal modelling and reasoning are closely related. But while the rigour of building formal models brings significant benefits, formal reasoning remains a major barrier to the wider acceptance of formalism within design. Here we propose reasoned modelling critics - an approach which aims to abstract away from the complexities of low-level proof obligations, and provide high-level modelling guidance to designers when proofs fail. Inspired by proof planning critics, the technique combines proof-failure analysis with modelling heuristics. Here, we present the details of our proposal, implement them in a prototype and outline future plans. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 293-309 |
| Journal | Science of Computer Programming |
| Volume | 78 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 25 Apr 2011 |
Keywords
- Artificial intelligence
- Automated reasoning
- Formal methods
- Formal modelling
- Formal verification
- Reasoned modelling
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reasoned modelling critics: Turning failed proofs into modelling guidance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver