TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantitative comparison of reconstruction methods for intra-voxel fiber recovery from diffusion MRI
AU - Daducci, Alessandro
AU - Canales-Rodriguez, Erick Jorge
AU - Descoteaux, Maxime
AU - Garyfallidis, Eleftherios
AU - Gur, Yaniv
AU - Lin, Ying Chia
AU - Mani, Merry
AU - Merlet, Sylvain
AU - Paquette, Michael
AU - Ramirez-Manzanares, Alonso
AU - Reisert, Marco
AU - Rodrigues, Paulo Reis
AU - Sepehrband, Farshid
AU - Caruyer, Emmanuel
AU - Choupan, Jeiran
AU - Deriche, Rachid
AU - Jacob, Mathews
AU - Menegaz, Gloria
AU - Prckovska, Vesna
AU - Rivera, Mariano
AU - Wiaux, Yves
AU - Thiran, Jean-Philippe
PY - 2014/2
Y1 - 2014/2
N2 - Validation is arguably the bottleneck in the diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) community. This paper evaluates and compares 20 algorithms for recovering the local intra-voxel fiber structure from diffusion MRI data and is based on the results of the 'HARDI reconstruction challenge' organized in the context of the 'ISBI 2012' conference. Evaluated methods encompass a mixture of classical techniques well known in the literature such as diffusion tensor, Q-Ball and diffusion spectrum imaging, algorithms inspired by the recent theory of compressed sensing and also brand new approaches proposed for the first time at this contest. To quantitatively compare the methods under controlled conditions, two datasets with known ground-truth were synthetically generated and two main criteria were used to evaluate the quality of the reconstructions in every voxel: correct assessment of the number of fiber populations and angular accuracy in their orientation. This comparative study investigates the behavior of every algorithm with varying experimental conditions and highlights strengths and weaknesses of each approach. This information can be useful not only for enhancing current algorithms and develop the next generation of reconstruction methods, but also to assist physicians in the choice of the most adequate technique for their studies.
AB - Validation is arguably the bottleneck in the diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) community. This paper evaluates and compares 20 algorithms for recovering the local intra-voxel fiber structure from diffusion MRI data and is based on the results of the 'HARDI reconstruction challenge' organized in the context of the 'ISBI 2012' conference. Evaluated methods encompass a mixture of classical techniques well known in the literature such as diffusion tensor, Q-Ball and diffusion spectrum imaging, algorithms inspired by the recent theory of compressed sensing and also brand new approaches proposed for the first time at this contest. To quantitatively compare the methods under controlled conditions, two datasets with known ground-truth were synthetically generated and two main criteria were used to evaluate the quality of the reconstructions in every voxel: correct assessment of the number of fiber populations and angular accuracy in their orientation. This comparative study investigates the behavior of every algorithm with varying experimental conditions and highlights strengths and weaknesses of each approach. This information can be useful not only for enhancing current algorithms and develop the next generation of reconstruction methods, but also to assist physicians in the choice of the most adequate technique for their studies.
KW - Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI)
KW - local reconstruction
KW - quantitative comparison
KW - synthetic data
KW - validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894069836&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TMI.2013.2285500
DO - 10.1109/TMI.2013.2285500
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84894069836
SN - 0278-0062
VL - 33
SP - 384
EP - 399
JO - IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
JF - IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
IS - 2
ER -