Abstract
Purpose: There is a paucity of descriptive injury data relevant to professional academy football, with little to no evidence reporting how sports science/medicine staff within academies collect and use injury data.
Materials and methods: An online survey relating to the perceptions surrounding injury data collec- tion, its value and use was developed. Forty-seven applied practitioners working for different profes- sional football academies completed the survey.
Results: Injury data collection procedures conducted by appropriately trained medical staff are wide- spread among football academies. Injury data collection within academies was deemed worthwhile and important by 79% of practitioners. Similarly, 79% strongly agreed/agreed that using injury data for academic research is worthwhile. The engagement with and use of injury data by coaching staff appears to be relatively poor, with only 49% of practitioners stating coaches formally review data.
Conclusions: Injury data are widely collected within academies and practitioners consider this informa- tion valuable. However, improving engagement with coaches and using the data for academic research could further improve applied practice.
Practical implications: Applied practitioners should consider sharing injury data with both researchers and coaches. In doing so evidence-guided injury prevention interventions may be developed and subsequently applied in the field.
Materials and methods: An online survey relating to the perceptions surrounding injury data collec- tion, its value and use was developed. Forty-seven applied practitioners working for different profes- sional football academies completed the survey.
Results: Injury data collection procedures conducted by appropriately trained medical staff are wide- spread among football academies. Injury data collection within academies was deemed worthwhile and important by 79% of practitioners. Similarly, 79% strongly agreed/agreed that using injury data for academic research is worthwhile. The engagement with and use of injury data by coaching staff appears to be relatively poor, with only 49% of practitioners stating coaches formally review data.
Conclusions: Injury data are widely collected within academies and practitioners consider this informa- tion valuable. However, improving engagement with coaches and using the data for academic research could further improve applied practice.
Practical implications: Applied practitioners should consider sharing injury data with both researchers and coaches. In doing so evidence-guided injury prevention interventions may be developed and subsequently applied in the field.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 141-148 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Science and Medicine in Football |
Volume | 2 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 29 Nov 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 3 Apr 2018 |