Priming Resistance to Persuasion decreases adherence to Conspiracy Theories*

Eric Bonetto, Jais Adam-Troian, Florent Varet, Grégory Lo Monaco, Fabien Girandola

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research in the field of Resistance to Persuasion (RP) has demonstrated that inoculating individuals with counter arguments is effective for lowering their levels of adherence to conspiracist beliefs (CB). Yet, this strategy is limited because it requires specific arguments tailored against targeted conspiracist narratives. Therefore, we investigated whether priming Resistance to Persuasion would reduce individual adherence to CB among undergraduate student samples. A first study (N = 81) demonstrated that participants primed by filling a RP scale had lower CB scores than control participants. This effect was directly replicated twice (N = 205 and N = 265) and confirmed by a mini meta-analysis (N = 519; d = .20). Practical and theoretical implications are then discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-136
Number of pages12
JournalSocial Influence
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 May 2018

Keywords

  • conspiracy theories
  • inoculation
  • meta-cognition
  • priming
  • Resistance to Persuasion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Priming Resistance to Persuasion decreases adherence to Conspiracy Theories*'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this