Primary task disruption from multiple in-vehicle systems

Terry C. Lansdown, Nikki Brook-Carter, Tanita Kersloot

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    In-vehicle systems may distract or interrupt the driver and can compete with the primary task of safe vehicle control. This study investigates the consequences arising from multiple in-vehicle distractions. It aims to investigate the impact of simultaneous information conflicts, from multiple secondary in-vehicle tasks, on the primary task of driving.</p> <p>Participants were presented with a primary task, representing some of the visual and manual aspects of driving, and three secondary tasks (visual, auditory, and visual and auditory stimuli), representing some of the aspects of in-vehicle system operation. Differences between the impact of the three secondary tasks on performance in the primary task were investigated. The priority (high/low) that participants applied to the task was also considered.</p> <p>Lane exceedence (vehicle out of lane) and lane deviation (tracking error) were found to increase with the introduction of secondary tasks. Overall mental workload and anger and frustration were reported as being higher when conducting both primary and secondary tasks, as opposed to solely a primary task. Differences between the impact of the three secondary tasks on these factors were not observed. Findings suggest that in situations of information conflict, participants experience equal task disruption regardless of the sensory channel of the secondary task if the quantity of information presented is carefully controlled. Resource theories would suggest that overloading the visual channel would result in performance decrements. Findings from this study do not support this view. Copyright © 2002 TRL Limited.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)151-168
    Number of pages18
    JournalIntelligent Transportation Systems Journal
    Volume7
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2002

    Fingerprint

    Frustration
    Anger
    Task Performance and Analysis
    Workload
    Conflict (Psychology)

    Keywords

    • Disruption
    • Driving
    • Modality
    • Multiple
    • Workload

    Cite this

    Lansdown, Terry C. ; Brook-Carter, Nikki ; Kersloot, Tanita. / Primary task disruption from multiple in-vehicle systems. In: Intelligent Transportation Systems Journal. 2002 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 151-168.
    @article{7450ba7dd7c749c9b0f94d30a909c341,
    title = "Primary task disruption from multiple in-vehicle systems",
    abstract = "In-vehicle systems may distract or interrupt the driver and can compete with the primary task of safe vehicle control. This study investigates the consequences arising from multiple in-vehicle distractions. It aims to investigate the impact of simultaneous information conflicts, from multiple secondary in-vehicle tasks, on the primary task of driving. Participants were presented with a primary task, representing some of the visual and manual aspects of driving, and three secondary tasks (visual, auditory, and visual and auditory stimuli), representing some of the aspects of in-vehicle system operation. Differences between the impact of the three secondary tasks on performance in the primary task were investigated. The priority (high/low) that participants applied to the task was also considered. Lane exceedence (vehicle out of lane) and lane deviation (tracking error) were found to increase with the introduction of secondary tasks. Overall mental workload and anger and frustration were reported as being higher when conducting both primary and secondary tasks, as opposed to solely a primary task. Differences between the impact of the three secondary tasks on these factors were not observed. Findings suggest that in situations of information conflict, participants experience equal task disruption regardless of the sensory channel of the secondary task if the quantity of information presented is carefully controlled. Resource theories would suggest that overloading the visual channel would result in performance decrements. Findings from this study do not support this view. Copyright {\circledC} 2002 TRL Limited.",
    keywords = "Disruption, Driving, Modality, Multiple, Workload",
    author = "Lansdown, {Terry C.} and Nikki Brook-Carter and Tanita Kersloot",
    year = "2002",
    month = "4",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1080/10248070190048736",
    language = "English",
    volume = "7",
    pages = "151--168",
    journal = "Intelligent Transportation Systems Journal",
    issn = "1024-8072",
    publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
    number = "2",

    }

    Primary task disruption from multiple in-vehicle systems. / Lansdown, Terry C.; Brook-Carter, Nikki; Kersloot, Tanita.

    In: Intelligent Transportation Systems Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.04.2002, p. 151-168.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Primary task disruption from multiple in-vehicle systems

    AU - Lansdown, Terry C.

    AU - Brook-Carter, Nikki

    AU - Kersloot, Tanita

    PY - 2002/4/1

    Y1 - 2002/4/1

    N2 - In-vehicle systems may distract or interrupt the driver and can compete with the primary task of safe vehicle control. This study investigates the consequences arising from multiple in-vehicle distractions. It aims to investigate the impact of simultaneous information conflicts, from multiple secondary in-vehicle tasks, on the primary task of driving. Participants were presented with a primary task, representing some of the visual and manual aspects of driving, and three secondary tasks (visual, auditory, and visual and auditory stimuli), representing some of the aspects of in-vehicle system operation. Differences between the impact of the three secondary tasks on performance in the primary task were investigated. The priority (high/low) that participants applied to the task was also considered. Lane exceedence (vehicle out of lane) and lane deviation (tracking error) were found to increase with the introduction of secondary tasks. Overall mental workload and anger and frustration were reported as being higher when conducting both primary and secondary tasks, as opposed to solely a primary task. Differences between the impact of the three secondary tasks on these factors were not observed. Findings suggest that in situations of information conflict, participants experience equal task disruption regardless of the sensory channel of the secondary task if the quantity of information presented is carefully controlled. Resource theories would suggest that overloading the visual channel would result in performance decrements. Findings from this study do not support this view. Copyright © 2002 TRL Limited.

    AB - In-vehicle systems may distract or interrupt the driver and can compete with the primary task of safe vehicle control. This study investigates the consequences arising from multiple in-vehicle distractions. It aims to investigate the impact of simultaneous information conflicts, from multiple secondary in-vehicle tasks, on the primary task of driving. Participants were presented with a primary task, representing some of the visual and manual aspects of driving, and three secondary tasks (visual, auditory, and visual and auditory stimuli), representing some of the aspects of in-vehicle system operation. Differences between the impact of the three secondary tasks on performance in the primary task were investigated. The priority (high/low) that participants applied to the task was also considered. Lane exceedence (vehicle out of lane) and lane deviation (tracking error) were found to increase with the introduction of secondary tasks. Overall mental workload and anger and frustration were reported as being higher when conducting both primary and secondary tasks, as opposed to solely a primary task. Differences between the impact of the three secondary tasks on these factors were not observed. Findings suggest that in situations of information conflict, participants experience equal task disruption regardless of the sensory channel of the secondary task if the quantity of information presented is carefully controlled. Resource theories would suggest that overloading the visual channel would result in performance decrements. Findings from this study do not support this view. Copyright © 2002 TRL Limited.

    KW - Disruption

    KW - Driving

    KW - Modality

    KW - Multiple

    KW - Workload

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748651266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/10248070190048736

    DO - 10.1080/10248070190048736

    M3 - Article

    VL - 7

    SP - 151

    EP - 168

    JO - Intelligent Transportation Systems Journal

    JF - Intelligent Transportation Systems Journal

    SN - 1024-8072

    IS - 2

    ER -