Preoperative Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy and the Effect on Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Duncan Muir, Byung Choi, Matthew Holden, Caterina Clements, Jennifer Stevens, Kumaran Ratnasingham, Shashi Irukulla, Samer Humadi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Preoperative oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) in bariatric surgery remains a controversial topic, with a large variety in practice globally. An electronic database search of Medline, Embase and PubMed was performed in an aim to categorise the findings of preoperative endoscopies in bariatric patients. A total of 47 studies were included in this meta-analysis resulting in 23,368 patients being assessed. Of patients assessed, 40.8% were found to have no novel findings, 39.7% had novel findings which did not affect surgical planning, 19.8% had findings that affected their surgery and 0.3% were ruled to not be suitable for bariatric surgery. Preoperative OGD is altering surgical planning in one-fifth of patients; however, further comparative studies are required to determine if each patient should undergo this procedure especially if asymptomatic.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2546-2556
Number of pages11
JournalObesity Surgery
Volume33
Issue number8
Early online date14 Jun 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2023

Keywords

  • Meta-analysis
  • Bariatric surgery
  • Preoperative oesophagogastroduodenoscopy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Preoperative Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy and the Effect on Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this