Potential artifacts and misinterpretations when evaluating the ecotoxicological effects of nanomaterials

E. J. Petersen; T. B. Henry; J. Zhao; R. I. MacCuspie; T. L. Kirschling; V. Hackley; B. Xing; J. C. White

Potential artifacts and misinterpretations when evaluating the ecotoxicological effects of nanomaterials

E. J. Petersen, T. B. Henry, J. Zhao, R. I. MacCuspie, T. L. Kirschling, V. Hackley, B. Xing, J. C. White

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) have significant commercial potential in a broad range of industries for consumer products as a result of their novel properties. However, these same properties may cause unexpected risks once ENMs are released into the environment either intentionally or unintentionally. Thus, standard methods are needed to accurately and reproducibly assess the potential risk of ENMs. One factor that limits the applicability of standard ecotoxicology test methods for use with ENMs is that the unique behaviors of ENMs may cause artifacts or misinterpretations in these tests as a result of their unique behaviors. We briefly discuss these artifacts and misinterpretations and provide an illustrative example.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Nanotechnology 2014
Subtitle of host publication	Electronics, Manufacturing, Environment, Energy & Water Technical Proceedings of the 2014 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Expo
Publisher	CRC Press
Pages	123-126
Number of pages	4
Volume	3
ISBN (Print)	9781482258301
Publication status	Published - 11 Jun 2014
Event	Nanotechnology 2014: Electronics, Manufacturing, Environment, Energy and Water - Washington, DC, United Kingdom Duration: 15 Jun 2014 → 18 Jun 2014

Conference

Conference	Nanotechnology 2014: Electronics, Manufacturing, Environment, Energy and Water
Abbreviated title	NSTI-Nanotech 2014
Country/Territory	United Kingdom
City	Washington, DC
Period	15/06/14 → 18/06/14

Keywords

Artifacts
Nanoecotoxicology
Nanomaterials
Nanoparticle
Standard test methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Hardware and Architecture
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

Cite this

Petersen, E. J., Henry, T. B., Zhao, J., MacCuspie, R. I., Kirschling, T. L., Hackley, V., Xing, B., & White, J. C. (2014). Potential artifacts and misinterpretations when evaluating the ecotoxicological effects of nanomaterials. In Nanotechnology 2014: Electronics, Manufacturing, Environment, Energy & Water Technical Proceedings of the 2014 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Expo (Vol. 3, pp. 123-126). CRC Press.

@inproceedings{d2d39f05ab384c20bc23b144a43f2f20,

title = "Potential artifacts and misinterpretations when evaluating the ecotoxicological effects of nanomaterials",

abstract = "Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) have significant commercial potential in a broad range of industries for consumer products as a result of their novel properties. However, these same properties may cause unexpected risks once ENMs are released into the environment either intentionally or unintentionally. Thus, standard methods are needed to accurately and reproducibly assess the potential risk of ENMs. One factor that limits the applicability of standard ecotoxicology test methods for use with ENMs is that the unique behaviors of ENMs may cause artifacts or misinterpretations in these tests as a result of their unique behaviors. We briefly discuss these artifacts and misinterpretations and provide an illustrative example.",

keywords = "Artifacts, Nanoecotoxicology, Nanomaterials, Nanoparticle, Standard test methods",

author = "Petersen, {E. J.} and Henry, {T. B.} and J. Zhao and MacCuspie, {R. I.} and Kirschling, {T. L.} and V. Hackley and B. Xing and White, {J. C.}",

year = "2014",

month = jun,

day = "11",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781482258301",

volume = "3",

pages = "123--126",

booktitle = "Nanotechnology 2014",

publisher = "CRC Press",

note = "Nanotechnology 2014: Electronics, Manufacturing, Environment, Energy and Water, NSTI-Nanotech 2014 ; Conference date: 15-06-2014 Through 18-06-2014",

}

Petersen, EJ, Henry, TB, Zhao, J, MacCuspie, RI, Kirschling, TL, Hackley, V, Xing, B & White, JC 2014, Potential artifacts and misinterpretations when evaluating the ecotoxicological effects of nanomaterials. in Nanotechnology 2014: Electronics, Manufacturing, Environment, Energy & Water Technical Proceedings of the 2014 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Expo. vol. 3, CRC Press, pp. 123-126, Nanotechnology 2014: Electronics, Manufacturing, Environment, Energy and Water, Washington, DC, United Kingdom, 15/06/14.

Potential artifacts and misinterpretations when evaluating the ecotoxicological effects of nanomaterials. / Petersen, E. J.; Henry, T. B.; Zhao, J. et al.
Nanotechnology 2014: Electronics, Manufacturing, Environment, Energy & Water Technical Proceedings of the 2014 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Expo. Vol. 3 CRC Press, 2014. p. 123-126.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Potential artifacts and misinterpretations when evaluating the ecotoxicological effects of nanomaterials

AU - Petersen, E. J.

AU - Henry, T. B.

AU - Zhao, J.

AU - MacCuspie, R. I.

AU - Kirschling, T. L.

AU - Hackley, V.

AU - Xing, B.

AU - White, J. C.

PY - 2014/6/11

Y1 - 2014/6/11

N2 - Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) have significant commercial potential in a broad range of industries for consumer products as a result of their novel properties. However, these same properties may cause unexpected risks once ENMs are released into the environment either intentionally or unintentionally. Thus, standard methods are needed to accurately and reproducibly assess the potential risk of ENMs. One factor that limits the applicability of standard ecotoxicology test methods for use with ENMs is that the unique behaviors of ENMs may cause artifacts or misinterpretations in these tests as a result of their unique behaviors. We briefly discuss these artifacts and misinterpretations and provide an illustrative example.

AB - Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) have significant commercial potential in a broad range of industries for consumer products as a result of their novel properties. However, these same properties may cause unexpected risks once ENMs are released into the environment either intentionally or unintentionally. Thus, standard methods are needed to accurately and reproducibly assess the potential risk of ENMs. One factor that limits the applicability of standard ecotoxicology test methods for use with ENMs is that the unique behaviors of ENMs may cause artifacts or misinterpretations in these tests as a result of their unique behaviors. We briefly discuss these artifacts and misinterpretations and provide an illustrative example.

KW - Artifacts

KW - Nanoecotoxicology

KW - Nanomaterials

KW - Nanoparticle

KW - Standard test methods

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84907389303

SN - 9781482258301

VL - 3

SP - 123

EP - 126

BT - Nanotechnology 2014

PB - CRC Press

T2 - Nanotechnology 2014: Electronics, Manufacturing, Environment, Energy and Water

Y2 - 15 June 2014 through 18 June 2014

ER -

Petersen EJ, Henry TB, Zhao J, MacCuspie RI, Kirschling TL, Hackley V et al. Potential artifacts and misinterpretations when evaluating the ecotoxicological effects of nanomaterials. In Nanotechnology 2014: Electronics, Manufacturing, Environment, Energy & Water Technical Proceedings of the 2014 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Expo. Vol. 3. CRC Press. 2014. p. 123-126

Potential artifacts and misinterpretations when evaluating the ecotoxicological effects of nanomaterials

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Fingerprint

Cite this