TY - JOUR
T1 - Policy mixes for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions
T2 - An analysis of six European countries and the European Union
AU - van der Jagt, Alexander
AU - Tozer, Laura
AU - Toxopeus, Helen
AU - Runhaar, Hens
N1 - Funding Information:
This research has been funded by the European Commission’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 730243 and participating partners in the NATURVATION project.
Funding Information:
Across the cases, we found four types of financial policy instruments. The first type is a cluster of financial instruments providing cash grants or subsidies, which we term physical infrastructure, human capital and R&D funding. For instance, the Swedish Strategic Innovation Programme (SIP) – coordinated by the Swedish innovation agency Vinnova, the Swedish Energy Agency (Energimyndigheten) and the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development – provides funding for cross-sectoral projects on strategically important topics, involving industry, the public sector and academia. In the past, there have been a number of themed calls relevant to urban NBS such as the 2019 call on 'Green material development in the infrastructure area'. Examples of funded projects under this are ‘C/O Cities’ supporting smaller cities with knowledge tools to help integrate ecosystem services into town planning and ‘BiodiverCity’ on experimenting with multifunctional urban NBS in densely developed parts of Malmö. Of the other three types of financial instruments, we encountered one of each type. The Natural Capital Financing Facility (NCFF), is a reduced-interest loan, run by the European Investment Bank (EIB) as part of the EU LIFE Programme since 2014. It offers loans of > €5 million to fund large-scale NBS for climate action. The city of Athens (Greece) was one of the first to successfully apply to this fund, which it will use to roll-out green-blue infrastructure measures across 400 sites within its city boundaries.
Funding Information:
We are grateful to Harriet Bulkeley and Rob Raven for co-designing the research protocol, Margot Stoete for graphical design and Hade Dorst, Christiane Gerstetter, McKenna Davis, Sandra Naumann, Alexandru Matei, Judit Boros, Andrea Lituma-Sanchez, Ewa Iwaszuk, Lisa-Fee Meinecke, Linda Juhasz-Horvath, Sydney Kaiser, Rebeka Devenyi and Elisa Terragno Bogliaccini for contributing to the case studies used as the basis for this study. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their supportive feedback. This research has been funded by the European Commission's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 730243 and participating partners in the NATURVATION project.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Nature-based solutions (NBS) are multifunctional and cost-effective innovations delivering urban sustainability, but they are not yet mainstream in urban development. This can be explained by persistent structural conditions in the urban infrastructure regime, resulting in barriers such as lack of collaborative governance, inadequate knowledge and limited funding availability. In this paper we argue that (supra)national governments could play an important role in breaking down these barriers by employing policy instruments and strategically combining these into policy mixes targeting multiple regime structures. By means of an empirical analysis across six European countries and the European Union (EU), we provide an overview of regulatory, financial and soft (supra)national policy instruments supporting urban NBS mainstreaming and how these are combined in policy mixes across cases. In addition, we investigate policy mix comprehensiveness by mapping the extent to which these target each of the relevant urban infrastructure regime structures underpinning barriers to urban NBS mainstreaming. We demonstrate that, with the exception of the EU, none of the studied cases employs a fully comprehensive policy mix. We conclude that by strategically adopting policy instruments with the aim of crafting a comprehensive policy mix, obstacles in pathways to urban NBS mainstreaming could be overcome.
AB - Nature-based solutions (NBS) are multifunctional and cost-effective innovations delivering urban sustainability, but they are not yet mainstream in urban development. This can be explained by persistent structural conditions in the urban infrastructure regime, resulting in barriers such as lack of collaborative governance, inadequate knowledge and limited funding availability. In this paper we argue that (supra)national governments could play an important role in breaking down these barriers by employing policy instruments and strategically combining these into policy mixes targeting multiple regime structures. By means of an empirical analysis across six European countries and the European Union (EU), we provide an overview of regulatory, financial and soft (supra)national policy instruments supporting urban NBS mainstreaming and how these are combined in policy mixes across cases. In addition, we investigate policy mix comprehensiveness by mapping the extent to which these target each of the relevant urban infrastructure regime structures underpinning barriers to urban NBS mainstreaming. We demonstrate that, with the exception of the EU, none of the studied cases employs a fully comprehensive policy mix. We conclude that by strategically adopting policy instruments with the aim of crafting a comprehensive policy mix, obstacles in pathways to urban NBS mainstreaming could be overcome.
KW - Innovation and transitions
KW - Sustainable cities
KW - Sustainable urban development
KW - Urban governance
KW - Urban planning
KW - Urban sustainability transformations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140468216&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.10.011
DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.10.011
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85140468216
SN - 1462-9011
VL - 139
SP - 51
EP - 61
JO - Environmental Science and Policy
JF - Environmental Science and Policy
ER -